Related Experiment Videos
Effects of culling on sire evaluations by mixed models
Journal of Dairy Science
|November 1, 1983
Summary
Culling low-yield second lactation records in Holstein sire evaluations minimally impacted overall accuracy. Adjusting for selection effects maintained bull rankings, ensuring reliable genetic predictions for milk and fat yield.
Area of Science:
- Animal Science
- Dairy Cattle Genetics
- Quantitative Genetics
Background:
- Accurate genetic evaluation of dairy sires is crucial for genetic improvement.
- Selection bias can affect the accuracy of genetic predictions, particularly when using multiple records.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the impact of culling low-yield second lactation records on Holstein sire genetic evaluations.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of adjustment methods for selection bias in sire evaluations.
Main Methods:
- Utilized milk and fat yield records from 677,800 Holstein daughters of 200 sires.
- Applied Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (BLUP) for sire evaluations.
- Simulated culling of 10%, 20%, and 30% of lowest second lactation milk yield records.
Main Results:
- Culling low-yield second records reduced milk evaluation standard deviations and correlations between first and second records.
- Evaluations using both records showed minimal impact from culling, with high correlations.
- Adjustment for selection effectively mitigated the effects of culling on sire evaluations.
Conclusions:
- Culling low-yield second records has a limited negative impact on sire genetic evaluations when using both records.
- Adjustment for selection is effective in removing bias and maintaining the accuracy of genetic predictions.
- BLUP and Modified Contemporary Comparison procedures yield similar results regarding culling and adjustment effects.