Related Experiment Videos
Water survival: 20 years Canadian Forces aircrew experience
Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine
|January 1, 1984
Summary
Canadian Forces (CF) aircrew water immersion accidents between 1962-1982 show a low survival rate, especially with little warning. Survival chances improve with water survival training and swimming skills.
Area of Science:
- Aerospace Medicine
- Naval Safety
- Human Factors Engineering
Background:
- Water immersion incidents pose significant risks to Canadian Forces (CF) aircrew.
- Previous reviews have analyzed ejection/ditching incidents, but a comprehensive look at water survival and injury patterns is needed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze Canadian Forces (CF) aircrew ejection/ditching incidents involving water immersion over a 20-year period (1962-1982).
- To identify patterns in survival/rescue times and injury types in both salt and fresh water environments.
- To assess the risk factors associated with different aircraft types and water conditions.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 595 Category A, B, and C accidents from 1962 to 1982.
- Analysis of 37 water-entry incidents involving 116 crew members.
- Categorization of accidents by aircraft type, water type (salt/fresh), warning times, and survival outcomes.
Main Results:
- 38 out of 116 crew members died in water-entry accidents (4 in fresh water).
- Sea King helicopters were most at risk for sea water immersion; single-engine Otters for fresh water.
- Most crew had less than 1 minute warning (92%) and less than 15 seconds to respond (78%).
- Hypothermia occurred in two cases; survival was better for trained swimmers/divers.
- Rescue times were under 3 hours, with 16 of 24 cases rescued within 15 minutes.
Conclusions:
- Water immersion accidents are infrequent but dangerous for CF aircrew.
- Limited warning time significantly impacts survival.
- Water survival training, Dilbert Dunker qualification, and strong swimming skills enhance aircrew survivability.
- Rescue response times are generally efficient, but proactive survival training is crucial.