Related Experiment Videos
Multiple stapling for wrist arthrodesis in the nonrheumatoid patient
The Journal of Hand Surgery
|March 1, 1984
Summary
Staple fixation alone for wrist fusion avoids bone grafting and extensive casting, achieving successful fusion in most patients with minimal complications. While staples may require removal, this method offers a less invasive alternative for wrist arthrodesis.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Hand and Wrist Surgery
Background:
- Wrist fusion (arthrodesis) is a common procedure for debilitating wrist conditions.
- Traditional methods often involve corticocancellous bone grafting and extensive immobilization, carrying potential complications and patient morbidity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of staple fixation alone for wrist fusion.
- To assess fusion rates, complications, and patient outcomes compared to traditional techniques.
Main Methods:
- A consecutive series of 26 wrist fusions using only staple fixation were reviewed.
- Follow-up averaged 40 months, assessing fusion time, complications, and need for secondary procedures.
Main Results:
- Twenty-five out of 26 wrists achieved fusion in an average of 3.2 months.
- Complications occurred in three cases; 22 cases (88%) had uneventful results.
- Fifty-six percent of patients requested staple removal, and the technique did not shorten fusion time but avoided bone grafting and extensive casting.
Conclusions:
- Staple fixation alone is a viable technique for wrist fusion, offering good stability with minimal splintage.
- This method effectively avoids corticocancellous bone grafting and associated morbidity.
- While staple removal is common, the overall complication rate is low, making it a favorable alternative for wrist arthrodesis.