Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How does magnetic resonance compare with computed tomography?

W A Murphy

    Radiology
    |July 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging technology, benefiting from computed tomography (CT) advancements, shows comparable or superior performance. Continued development and investigation of MR are encouraged due to its potential for greater diagnostic information and cost-effectiveness.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Perfusion-weighted imaging with dynamic contrast enhancement (PWI/DCE) morphologic, qualitative, semiquantitative, and radiomics features predicting undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) treatment response.

    Scientific reports·2024
    Same author

    Consistency of response and image recognition, pulmonary nodules.

    The British journal of radiology·2014
    Same author

    Analysis of responses to hAmylin, hCGRP, and hADM in isolated resistance arteries from the mesenteric vascular bed of the rat.

    Peptides·2001
    Same author

    GI side-effects of a possible therapeutic GRF analogue in monkeys are likely due to VIP receptor agonist activity.

    Peptides·2001
    Same author

    Differential inhibition of growth hormone secretion by analogs selective for somatostatin receptor subtypes 2 and 5 in human growth-hormone-secreting adenoma cells in vitro.

    Neuroendocrinology·2001
    Same author

    Antitumor and antiangiogenic effects of somatostatin receptor-targeted in situ radiation with (111)In-DTPA-JIC 2DL.

    The Journal of surgical research·2001
    Same journal

    Machine Learning Multiorgan Analysis of Coronary CT Angiography Body Composition, Myocardial Infarction, and Mortality in the SCOT-HEART Trial.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Case 347: Tracheobronchial Smooth Muscle Atrophy and Separation.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    <sup>18</sup>F-Fluciclovine or <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT-guided Salvage Radiotherapy Changes in Postprostatectomy Biochemical Recurrence: Secondary Analysis of the EMPIRE-2 Trial.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Pelvic MRI in Endometrial Cancer Staging: A Retrospective Evaluation of the Impact of FIGO 2023.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Sequencing Ablation and Systemic Therapy in Colorectal Liver Oligometastases: An Upfront versus Delayed Approach Nationwide Analysis.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Case 351.

    Radiology·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Radiology
    • Medical Imaging Technology
    • Biomedical Engineering

    Background:

    • Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is an emerging technology.
    • MR has benefited from technological transfers from computed tomography (CT).
    • Further technological advancements in MR are anticipated.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the current status and future potential of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.
    • To compare MR imaging with computed tomography (CT) in terms of performance and cost-effectiveness.
    • To advocate for continued research and development in MR technology.

    Main Methods:

    • Comparative analysis of MR and CT imaging capabilities.
    • Assessment of MR imaging cost-benefit relative to CT.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of technological advancements and potential applications of MR.

    • Main Results:

    • MR imaging performance in some cases equals or surpasses CT.
    • Potential for less obvious MR advantages to emerge.
    • MR cost may be comparable to CT, with justification through enhanced information or reduced healthcare utilization.

    Conclusions:

    • The current performance of MR imaging is a significant achievement, matching CT.
    • Active support for rapid development and scientific investigation of MR technology is warranted.
    • MR imaging holds substantial promise for future medical diagnostics.