Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Genetic screening: marvel or menace?

P T Rowley

    Science (New York, N.Y.)
    |July 13, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Genetic screening identifies individuals at risk for genetic diseases. The focus should be on maximizing family options and ensuring accessible, confidential services.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Family issues in a psychoeducation group for women with a BRCA mutation.

    Clinical genetics·2002
    Same author

    Points to consider in designing a clinical trial to ascertain the utility of a genetic screening test.

    Genetic testing·2002
    Same author

    Issues in implementing prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis: results of a working conference.

    Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics·2001
    Same author

    Telomerase inhibitors.

    Anticancer research·2001
    Same author

    The regulation of telomerase activity in hematopoietic cells.

    Leukemia research·2000
    Same author

    Telomere-related components are coordinately synthesized during human T-lymphocyte activation.

    Leukemia research·1999
    Same journal

    Erratum for the Research Article "Detecting supramolecular organic nanoparticles during heat wave".

    Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
    Same journal

    Local signals, systemic decline.

    Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
    Same journal

    The mechanics of liver regeneration.

    Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
    Same journal

    Computing in a memory with physics.

    Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
    Same journal

    Retraction.

    Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
    Same journal

    Making time.

    Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Genetics
    • Public Health
    • Bioethics

    Background:

    • Genetic screening systematically identifies individuals with specific genotypes.
    • It aims to detect risks for genetic diseases and environmental susceptibilities.
    • Ethical considerations include privacy, reproduction rights, and societal impact.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore the multifaceted nature of genetic screening.
    • To differentiate between newborn, fetal, and carrier screening.
    • To address the societal challenges and ethical implications of genetic screening programs.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of different genetic screening types: newborn, fetal, and carrier screening.
    • Discussion of the objectives and implementation of genetic screening programs.
    Keywords:
    Analytical ApproachGenetics and Reproduction

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of the societal challenges, including cost-effectiveness, confidentiality, and public education.
  • Main Results:

    • Three primary types of genetic screening exist: newborn, fetal, and carrier screening.
    • Screening offers opportunities for early treatment, selective termination, and informed reproductive choices.
    • Effective programs require expert services, genetic counseling, confidentiality, and public education.

    Conclusions:

    • Genetic screening programs should prioritize maximizing options for at-risk families.
    • Integration with primary health care and enhanced public understanding of genetics are crucial.
    • Ethical considerations and societal impact must be carefully managed to avoid stigmatization and ensure freedom of choice.