Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Visual scoring of the middle latency response.

M I Mendel, P A Saraca, S E Gerber

    Ear and Hearing
    |May 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary

    Intensity level significantly impacts the detection of middle latency responses (MLRs). Lower intensity makes MLR identification difficult, while experienced scorers show better accuracy and reliability.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The long-term effects of Medicaid managed care on obstetrics care in three California counties.

    Health services research·2001
    Same author

    Managed care and perinatal regionalization in Washington State.

    Obstetrics and gynecology·2001
    Same author

    Recent changes in the etiology of hearing disorders: perinatal drug exposure.

    Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·1995
    Same author

    Estimated noise distributions across stages of consciousness utilizing the Fsp quantification technique.

    Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·1995
    Same author

    Infant feeding and phonologic development.

    International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology·1993
    Same author

    Successful recruiting strategies.

    ASHA·1993

    Area of Science:

    • Auditory Neuroscience
    • Neurophysiology

    Background:

    • Accurate identification of middle latency responses (MLRs) is crucial for auditory assessment.
    • Variability in MLR detection can arise from factors like stimulus intensity and scorer experience.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate interjudge validity and intrajudge reliability in identifying MLRs.
    • To determine the influence of stimulus intensity and number of stimuli on MLR detection accuracy.

    Main Methods:

    • Three sets of judges evaluated MLRs under varying intensity and stimulus count conditions.
    • Statistical analysis was performed to assess the impact of these factors on judgments.

    Main Results:

    • Stimulus intensity was the sole significant factor affecting MLR detection; lower intensities increased detection difficulty.
    • Experienced scorers exhibited higher confidence and accuracy compared to naive scorers.
    • Increasing stimulus count did not significantly affect scorer judgments.

    Conclusions:

    • Stimulus intensity is a critical determinant of MLR detection reliability and validity.
    • Scorer experience positively influences MLR identification accuracy.
    • MLR detection reliability is compromised at lower intensity levels, particularly 10 dB SL.

    Related Experiment Videos