Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Profile analysis and level variation.

C R Mason, G Kidd, T E Hanna

    Hearing Research
    |March 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The birthday problem: repeated sampling of animal populations and ethics of experimental design.

    Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience·2024
    Same author

    In vitro human skin absorption of linalool: Effects of vehicle composition, evaporation and occlusion on permeation and distribution.

    International journal of pharmaceutics·2022
    Same author

    The contact structure of Great Britain's salmon and trout aquaculture industry.

    Epidemics·2019
    Same author

    Identifying genotype specific elevated-risk areas and associated herd risk factors for bovine tuberculosis spread in British cattle.

    Epidemics·2018
    Same author

    Heterogeneous responses of temperate-zone amphibian populations to climate change complicates conservation planning.

    Scientific reports·2017
    Same author

    Male infertility in long-term survivors of pediatric cancer: a report from the childhood cancer survivor study.

    Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice·2014
    Same journal

    TGF-β signaling regulates flat epithelium formation in severely injured adult mouse utricle through epithelial-mesenchymal transition.

    Hearing research·2026
    Same journal

    Membrane scaffolding in auditory hair cells - a molecular tightrope walk enables lateral wall stiffness and flexibility.

    Hearing research·2026
    Same journal

    Speech-in-noise recognition during hearing protector use: Human performance and acoustic prediction.

    Hearing research·2026
    Same journal

    Estimation of hair cell loss from audiograms.

    Hearing research·2026
    Same journal

    Cochlear size variation in a large-scale international multicentre cohort.

    Hearing research·2026
    Same journal

    Estimation of minor-to-moderate conductive hearing loss with distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans.

    Hearing research·2026
    See all related articles

    Random level variation in auditory detection tasks impacts performance. Increasing the range of sound level variation decreases detection ability, with optimal performance at moderate intensity levels.

    Area of Science:

    • Auditory perception
    • Psychoacoustics
    • Signal detection theory

    Background:

    • Profile analysis studies often employ random level variation.
    • Understanding how stimulus level variability affects auditory detection is crucial for psychoacoustic research.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the impact of random level variation on auditory detection performance.
    • To examine the effects of range and median level variation on detecting sinusoidal increments within a complex sound.

    Main Methods:

    • A two-interval, forced-choice detection task was used.
    • Presentation levels of complex sinusoids were randomly varied across trials.
    • Three experiments manipulated the range of level variation, median level, and within-trial level differences.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Increased range of level variation led to decreased detection ability.
    • Detection performance was optimal at moderate sound intensity levels, declining at lower and higher levels.
    • Differences in presentation levels within a single trial had minimal impact on performance.

    Conclusions:

    • The range and median of sound level variation significantly influence auditory detection.
    • Auditory detection is most sensitive within a specific moderate intensity range.
    • Minimizing within-trial level variation is not critical for detection performance.