Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Partial vs. total footplate removal in stapedectomy: a comparative study.

C N Moon, M J Hahn

    The Laryngoscope
    |July 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary

    Partial footplate removal (PFR) in stapedectomy offers slightly better hearing gain, especially at higher frequencies, compared to total footplate removal (TFR). Both methods show similar results in lower frequencies and for speech understanding.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    DC-SIGN-specific liposomal targeting and selective intracellular compound delivery to human myeloid dendritic cells: implications for HIV disease.

    Scandinavian journal of immunology·2004
    Same author

    Development of a new epitope tag recognized by a monoclonal antibody to Rickettsia typhi.

    BioTechniques·2001
    Same author

    Cell cycling status of human cord blood CD34+ cells during ex vivo expansion is related to the level of very late antigen expression.

    Journal of Korean medical science·2001
    Same author

    Energy claims in the 21st century.

    Nutrition reviews·2001
    Same author

    Cloning and sequencing of the gene encoding the candidate HtrA of Rickettsia typhi.

    Microbiology and immunology·2000
    Same author

    Differential activation of MAP kinase family members triggered by CD99 engagement.

    FEBS letters·2000

    Area of Science:

    • Otolaryngology
    • Audiology
    • Surgical Outcomes

    Background:

    • Stapedectomy is a surgical procedure to restore hearing in patients with otosclerosis.
    • The extent of footplate removal (partial vs. total) is a key surgical decision with potential impacts on outcomes.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the postoperative results of partial footplate removal (PFR) versus total footplate removal (TFR) in stapedectomy.
    • To evaluate hearing gain, air-bone gap closure, speech function, and complication rates between the two surgical techniques.

    Main Methods:

    • A retrospective comparative study involving 264 ears with PFR and 106 ears with TFR.
    • Analysis of audiological data including decibel gain across frequency ranges (250-1000 Hz and 2000-8000 Hz), air-bone gap closure, and speech discrimination scores.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessment of the incidence of postoperative complications and the permanency of speech discrimination.

    • Main Results:

    • PFR demonstrated a consistently greater decibel gain in the high-frequency range (2000-8000 Hz) compared to TFR.
    • Decibel gain in the lower frequency range (250-1000 Hz) was comparable between PFR and TFR.
    • PFR cases showed slightly better average results for air-bone gap closure and speech outcomes.

    Conclusions:

    • Partial footplate removal in stapedectomy may offer superior high-frequency hearing improvement compared to total footplate removal.
    • Both techniques provide comparable low-frequency hearing gain and similar speech results, with PFR showing a slight advantage.
    • Further examination of the long-term stability of speech discrimination is warranted.