Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A morphogenetic classification of craniofacial malformations.

J C van der Meulen, R Mazzola, C Vermey-Keers

    Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
    |April 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Fungal Planet description sheets: 1781-1866.

    Persoonia·2025
    Same author

    Fungal Planet description sheets: 1697-1780.

    Fungal systematics and evolution·2025
    Same author

    Disaster, hope, help, reality.

    Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences·2015
    Same author

    Crisis and the physiotherapist.

    The Australian journal of physiotherapy·2014
    Same author

    Performance evaluation of a novel personalized ventilation-personalized exhaust system for airborne infection control.

    Indoor air·2014
    Same author

    Further evidence that scopolamine can improve verbal fluency.

    Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)·2012
    Same journal

    Building Practical Artificial Intelligence Tools For The Plastic Surgeon: A Step-By-Step Guide To Cowork.

    Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
    Same journal

    Interpretation Matters: Common Statistical Pitfalls in Retrospective Surgical Research.

    Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
    Same journal

    "Inferior Repositioning of the High-Riding Nipple Using a Parenchymal-Based Flap".

    Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
    Same journal

    A Four-Step Strategy for the Treatment of Facial Rhytids: A Focus on Upper Facial Wrinkles.

    Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
    Same journal

    Evaluating Long-Term Retention of Fresh-Frozen Costal Cartilage Allograft in An Animal Model.

    Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
    Same journal

    Manual extrusion of fat granules for primary thinning of a bulky flap.

    Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
    See all related articles

    This study proposes a new classification for craniofacial malformations based on embryology and patient data. It distinguishes between cerebral and non-cerebral types, categorizing them by dysostosis or synostosis.

    Area of Science:

    • Developmental biology
    • Medical genetics
    • Craniofacial surgery

    Background:

    • Craniofacial malformations represent a diverse group of congenital conditions.
    • Existing classifications may not fully capture the underlying embryologic origins.
    • A clear classification is essential for accurate diagnosis and treatment planning.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To introduce a novel classification system for craniofacial malformations.
    • To differentiate between malformations involving the brain/eyes and those affecting only the craniofacial structures.
    • To establish a new nomenclature based on embryologic principles.

    Main Methods:

    • Embryologic studies were conducted to understand developmental processes.
    • Extensive clinical observations of numerous patients with craniofacial malformations were analyzed.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • A systematic approach was used to categorize malformations based on their presumed etiology.

    • Main Results:

    • A distinction is made between cerebral craniofacial malformations (brain/eye involvement) and craniofacial malformations.
    • Craniofacial malformations are further classified based on dysostosis (abnormal bone development) and synostosis (abnormal bone fusion).
    • Dysostosis can arise from transformation or differentiation defects, while synostosis is attributed solely to differentiation defects.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed classification provides a more refined understanding of craniofacial malformations.
    • The new nomenclature facilitates clearer communication and research in the field.
    • This embryologically-based system aids in comprehending the pathogenesis of these complex conditions.