Related Experiment Videos
Serial spot hydroxyproline/creatinine ratios in metastatic prostatic cancer
The Journal of Urology
|February 1, 1983
Summary
Urinary hydroxyproline levels can predict bone response in advanced prostate cancer patients. Elevated levels indicate disease progression, offering an early objective sign of osseous involvement.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Biochemistry
- Urology
Background:
- Metastatic malignancies often involve bone, requiring reliable monitoring markers.
- Prostatic cancer frequently presents with predominant bone metastases, necessitating specific indicators.
- Current markers like acid and alkaline phosphatase have limitations in assessing osseous response.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate urinary hydroxyproline as a marker for monitoring bone involvement in stage D2 prostatic cancer.
- To compare the efficacy of urinary hydroxyproline with bone scans and phosphatase levels in assessing treatment response.
- To determine if urinary hydroxyproline can serve as an early objective sign of osseous response.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of urinary hydroxyproline levels in 32 men with stage D2 prostatic cancer.
- Monitoring patients via bone scans, acid phosphatase, and alkaline phosphatase values.
- Serial measurements were taken 4 to 36 months post-treatment initiation (hormonal manipulation and/or chemotherapy).
Main Results:
- Urinary hydroxyproline values progressively increased in patients with disease progression (based on bone scan).
- Elevated urinary hydroxyproline was significantly higher in progressing patients compared to stable/improving patients (p < 0.001).
- Alkaline phosphatase showed less significant differences; acid phosphatase was unreliable for osseous response.
Conclusions:
- Urinary hydroxyproline is a predictive and early objective marker for osseous response in stage D2 prostatic cancer.
- This marker aids in monitoring bone metastases during treatment for advanced prostate cancer.
- Hydroxyproline levels offer a more sensitive indicator of bone involvement compared to traditional phosphatase assays.