Related Experiment Videos
Evaluating continuity of care in primary care internal medicine programs
Southern Medical Journal
|June 1, 1983
Summary
Primary care residency programs evaluate patient continuity, with most tracking hospital follow-ups. Ambulatory care continuity assessment, like patient visit frequency, is less common.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Primary Care Training
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Primary care training programs aim to foster "continuity experiences" for residents.
- Federally funded programs are mandated to provide and evaluate continuity of care.
- Variability exists in defining and assessing continuity within these programs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate and evaluate the methods used by federally funded primary care internal medicine programs to assess resident continuity experiences.
- To understand the prevalence and types of continuity assessment tools employed.
Main Methods:
- A survey was conducted using a checklist of methods derived from existing literature.
- Fifty-two federally funded primary care internal medicine residency programs were targeted.
- Response rate was 64%, with 50 programs reporting on their continuity evaluation practices.
Main Results:
- Nearly all responding programs (96%) reported evaluating continuity of care.
- Most programs utilized multiple methods for assessment.
- Tracking resident follow-up of admitted patients was more common than assessing ambulatory care continuity.
- Ambulatory continuity assessment, such as patient visit frequency, ranked lower than methods like medical record audits and tracking missed appointments.
Conclusions:
- Primary care residency programs widely assess continuity, but methods vary significantly.
- There is a greater emphasis on evaluating inpatient continuity compared to ambulatory continuity.
- Further standardization and focus on ambulatory continuity assessment may be needed in primary care training.