Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Weekly control measurement at the linear accelerator].

G Christ

    Strahlentherapie
    |May 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study presents an automated method for radiation control measurements at the University Hospital Tübingen. The new procedure addresses time-consuming manual checks for linear accelerator quality assurance.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    [Female prostate cancer?]

    Der Pathologe·2017
    Same author

    Mechanisms of hemolysis-associated platelet activation.

    Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2013
    Same author

    Animal models of erectile dysfunction (ED): potential utility of non-human primates as a model of atherosclerosis-induced vascular ED.

    International journal of impotence research·2011
    Same author

    Effect of proton pump inhibitors on clinical outcome in patients treated with clopidogrel: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2010
    Same author

    Multiple electrode aggregometry predicts stent thrombosis better than the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation assay.

    Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2009
    Same author

    Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 predicts coronary in-stent restenosis of drug-eluting stents.

    Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2008
    Same journal

    Local sulfonamide pretreatment in the radium therapy of portiocarcinoma.

    Strahlentherapie·2010
    Same journal

    About an influence of the field shape on the can size when the tube is standing and moving.

    Strahlentherapie·2010
    Same journal

    Treatment of biological tissue with focused ultrasound.

    Strahlentherapie·2010
    Same journal

    About the negative threshold of ultraviolet erythema (studies on 105 people.).

    Strahlentherapie·2010
    Same journal

    UV rays and cell interface (AC measurements on frog skin irradiated with UV light.).

    Strahlentherapie·2010
    Same journal

    Tension measurements on tissues.

    Strahlentherapie·2010
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Physics
    • Radiation Oncology
    • Radiological Physics

    Context:

    • Quality assurance in radiation therapy is critical for patient safety and treatment efficacy.
    • Current methods for assessing linear accelerator performance, including field homogeneity and radiation energy, are often time-intensive.
    • Compliance with medical radiation protection guidelines is mandatory.

    Purpose:

    • To develop and present a largely automated procedure for weekly control measurements at a medical linear accelerator.
    • To reduce the time required for determining field homogeneity and radiation energy.
    • To ensure consistent and accurate quality assurance in radiation therapy.

    Summary:

    • The study details an automated procedure for weekly quality control measurements of a linear accelerator at the Medizinisches Strahleninstitut der Universität Tübingen.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • This automated approach addresses the time-consuming nature of traditional methods for assessing electron and X-ray radiation field homogeneity and energy.
  • The developed procedure aims to streamline and improve the efficiency of radiation protection compliance.
  • Impact:

    • Implementation of this automated procedure can lead to more frequent and thorough quality assurance checks.
    • Reduced measurement time allows for quicker identification and correction of potential linear accelerator issues.
    • Enhanced efficiency in quality assurance contributes to improved patient safety and optimized radiation therapy outcomes.