Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Experimentalism in bioethics research.

T F Ackerman

    The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
    |May 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Excitatory amino acid receptor subtype agonists induce feeding in the nucleus accumbens shell in rats: opioid antagonist actions and interactions with mu-opioid agonists.

    Brain research·2001
    Same author

    The ethics of drug research in children.

    Paediatric drugs·2001
    Same author

    Forsaking the spirit for the letter of law: advance directives in nursing homes.

    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society·1997
    Same author

    The moral implications of medical uncertainty: tube feeding demented patients.

    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society·1996
    Same author

    Chemically dependent physicians and informed consent disclosure.

    Journal of addictive diseases·1996
    Same author

    Genetic testing of children for cancer susceptibility.

    Journal of pediatric oncology nursing : official journal of the Association of Pediatric Oncology Nurses·1996
    Same journal

    Zygotes are Persisting Organisms.

    The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
    Same journal

    Ethical Examination of Genetic Enhancement from the Perspective of Confucian Human Dignity.

    The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
    Same journal

    Reproducing Anachronism: Ageing, Fertility and Inequality in Reproductive Governance.

    The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
    Same journal

    Genetic Moral Enhancement-A View Based on Mencius' Theory of Human Nature.

    The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
    Same journal

    Egalitarian Justice and the Prevalence Principle in Human Genome Editing.

    The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
    Same journal

    "It's Shaking Your Entire Construction as a Human Being": A Qualitative Analysis on Epistemic Injustice and Medical Gaslighting Consequences in Patients Living with Chronic Pain.

    The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
    See all related articles

    This study compares standard bioethics research with novel proposals, advocating for an experimental method to test metaethical hypotheses in biomedicine. It argues that such hypotheses can be empirically examined, advancing moral issue resolution.

    Area of Science:

    • Bioethics
    • Philosophy of Science
    • Biomedical Ethics

    Background:

    • Commentary on proposals for bioethics research structure and function.
    • Comparison of standard approaches with suggestions in 'What Bioethics Should Be.'

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare standard bioethics research methods with proposed experimental strategies.
    • To address fundamental differences in approaches to bioethical research.
    • To advocate for an experimental method for examining moral issues in biomedicine.

    Main Methods:

    • Comparative analysis of existing and proposed bioethics research frameworks.
    • Argumentation for the testability of metaethical hypotheses against reality.
    • Examination of the utility of an experimental approach in biomedical ethics.
    Keywords:
    Analytical ApproachBioethics and Professional EthicsPhilosophical Approach

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Identifies a common assumption underlying different bioethical viewpoints.
    • Highlights fundamental differences between standard and proposed research methods.
    • Argues that metaethical hypotheses in bioethics are empirically testable.

    Conclusions:

    • An experimental method offers a more productive strategy for addressing moral issues in biomedicine.
    • Metaethical hypotheses can be tested against reality, akin to refining natural science methods.
    • The proposed approach enhances the understanding of event correlations in nature and biomedical contexts.