Related Experiment Videos
Conception rates in synchronized beef cows with and without monensin feeding
Journal of Animal Science
|September 1, 1980
Summary
Syncro-Mate-B (SMB) treatment did not significantly improve overall conception rates in beef cows compared to natural breeding. However, crossbred cows showed higher conception rates with SMB timed insemination than Hereford cows.
Area of Science:
- Animal Science
- Reproductive Biology
- Ruminant Nutrition
Background:
- Optimizing beef cow reproductive efficiency is crucial for herd profitability.
- Timed artificial insemination protocols aim to improve conception rates and calving distribution.
- Monensin supplementation is used in cattle diets to alter rumen fermentation and potentially impact performance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of Syncro-Mate-B (SMB) for timed artificial insemination in Hereford and Hereford crossbred beef cows.
- To assess the impact of monensin supplementation on conception rates and rumen fermentation in these cattle.
- To compare conception rates between SMB-treated and naturally bred control groups.
Main Methods:
- Two groups of Hereford and two groups of Hereford crossbred beef cows were used.
- Cows were assigned to either SMB treatment with timed insemination or natural breeding (controls).
- Monensin supplementation (250 mg/head/day) was administered to one herd of each breed group.
Main Results:
- Overall conception rates were 77% for controls and 84.3% for SMB-treated cows, with no significant difference.
- Conception rates for SMB-timed insemination were significantly lower (P < .10) in Herefords (34.9%) compared to crossbreds (48.5%).
- Monensin treatment did not affect conception rates, but altered rumen acetate to propionate ratios in Herefords.
Conclusions:
- Syncro-Mate-B (SMB) treatment did not significantly improve overall conception rates in this study.
- Breed differences exist in response to SMB timed insemination, with crossbreds performing better.
- Monensin supplementation altered rumen fermentation but did not impact conception rates in the evaluated beef cow populations.