Related Experiment Videos
A strategy for surveying nursing practice in institutional settings
Research in Nursing & Health
|September 1, 1981
Summary
This study introduces a cost-effective two-stage mail survey for critical-care nurses. The method achieved high response rates and identified potential sampling biases, ensuring more representative nursing practice data.
Area of Science:
- Nursing Research
- Healthcare Surveys
- Methodology
Background:
- Surveying nursing practice in institutions faces challenges in achieving representative samples and cost-effectiveness.
- Previous methods for sampling critical-care nurses are reviewed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate a two-stage mail survey methodology for national sampling of critical-care nurses.
- To assess potential biases in nurse sampling methods.
Main Methods:
- A two-stage mail survey was conducted on a national sample of critical-care nurses.
- Stage one: Procured staff nurse lists from head nurses at 240 institutions (86% response rate).
- Stage two: Mailed questionnaires to 600 randomly selected nurses (87% completion rate).
Main Results:
- The two-stage survey achieved high response rates in both stages.
- Minimal evidence of sampling bias from administrative selection or volunteerism was observed.
- A significant portion of respondents would have been excluded if sampled via professional organization membership.
Conclusions:
- The described two-stage mail survey is an effective and efficient method for sampling critical-care nurses.
- This methodology helps mitigate biases inherent in other sampling techniques, such as using professional organization lists.
- Findings support the use of this approach for obtaining representative data on nursing practice.