Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Visual-field differences in picture-word interference.

S J Lupker, M Sanders

    Brain and Cognition
    |October 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Interaction between tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and BMI in early HER2-positive breast cancer: analysis of the ShortHER trial.

    ESMO open·2025
    Same author

    Zygomatic sialocoele with underlying ductal neoplasia in a cat.

    Australian veterinary journal·2025
    Same author

    Defining ultra-massive transfusion through a systematic review.

    American journal of surgery·2024
    Same author

    Defining Ultra-Massive Transfusion through a Systematic Review.

    American journal of surgery·2024
    Same author

    Homogeneous reduced moment in a gapful scalar chiral kagome antiferromagnet.

    Physical review. B·2024
    Same author

    Feasibility, preliminary efficacy, and accessibility of a twitter-based social support group vs Fitbit only to decrease sedentary behavior in women.

    Internet interventions·2021
    Same journal

    Gelastic dysarthria: Speech-triggered pathological laughter with evidence for a selective pontine gating mechanism.

    Brain and cognition·2026
    Same journal

    Brain correlates of linguistic-cognitive stimulation in neurotypical and Atypical older adult populations: A systematic review.

    Brain and cognition·2026
    Same journal

    Effects of Dieting on Neural Encoding of Preferences for Edible and Non-Edible Rewards: An ERP Study.

    Brain and cognition·2026
    Same journal

    Structural complexity of brain regions in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.

    Brain and cognition·2026
    Same journal

    Spatial navigation training enhances performance on large-scale and small-scale spatial tasks through different neural mechanisms.

    Brain and cognition·2026
    Same journal

    Unraveling the link between brain injury and enhanced artistic skills.

    Brain and cognition·2026
    See all related articles

    Picture-word interference effects differ between visual fields. Linguistic factors influence naming in the right visual field, but not the left, suggesting distinct hemispheric processing.

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Neuroscience
    • Visual Perception

    Background:

    • Picture-word interference occurs when a superimposed word slows picture naming.
    • This effect, similar to the Stroop phenomenon, is influenced by semantic and phonetic properties of the word.
    • Previous research primarily used central visual field presentations.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate how visual field (left vs. right) affects picture-word interference.
    • To determine if semantic and phonetic factors influence interference differently across visual fields.
    • To explore the role of hemispheric processing in visual word recognition and picture naming.

    Main Methods:

    • Participants viewed centrally presented pictures with superimposed words or consonant strings.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Stimuli were presented unilaterally in either the left or right visual field.
  • Picture-naming latency was measured under different interference conditions.

    • Main Results:

    • In the right visual field, interference was modulated by semantic and phonetic properties of the word, consistent with response competition.
    • In the left visual field, substantial interference occurred regardless of the word's linguistic properties.
    • Left visual field interference was independent of semantic and phonetic factors, challenging response competition models.

    Conclusions:

    • Right visual field processing aligns with established response competition models.
    • Left visual field interference patterns suggest a different processing mechanism, potentially linked to right hemisphere capabilities.
    • Hemispheric specialization plays a critical role in visual word recognition and its interaction with picture naming.