Related Experiment Videos
Skeletal profile changes related to two patterns of activator effects
American Journal of Orthodontics
|May 1, 1982
Summary
Activator treatment for Class II malocclusion shows two distinct effects on the skeletal profile, with variations potentially linked to appliance construction bites. Both methods correct dental alignment but differ in skeletal changes.
Area of Science:
- Orthodontics
- Dental cephalometrics
- Craniofacial growth
Background:
- Class II, Division 1 malocclusion is a common dental issue.
- Activator therapy is a recognized orthodontic treatment.
- Previous research identified two patterns of activator treatment effects.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate cephalometric profile changes from activator treatment in Class II, Division 1 malocclusion.
- To compare the effects of two previously identified activator treatment reaction patterns.
- To explore the influence of construction bite variations on treatment outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Longitudinal cephalometric study comparing treated subjects with a control group.
- Subjects initially presented with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion.
- Treatment involved exclusive use of activators.
Main Results:
- Both activator reaction patterns achieved similar corrections in apical base discrepancy and dental Class II relationships.
- The first reaction pattern improved mandibular retrognathism and occlusal plane rotation.
- The second reaction pattern reduced maxillary prognathism and caused mandibular rotation and lower incisor tipping.
Conclusions:
- Activator treatment for Class II malocclusion yields distinct skeletal profile changes based on reaction patterns.
- Differences in construction bite height of the activator appliance may dictate the type of reaction observed.
- Understanding these patterns allows for tailored treatment strategies in orthodontics.