Related Experiment Videos
Capitation payment for pharmacy services: impact on generic substitution
Medical Care
|August 1, 1980
Summary
Pharmacists" dispensing behavior changed significantly when a capitation system replaced fee-for-service reimbursement. The study found increased generic substitution rates and dollar savings without compromising appropriateness.
Area of Science:
- Health Economics
- Pharmacy Practice
- Health Services Research
Background:
- The conventional fee-for-service (FFS) reimbursement model for pharmacists under Medicaid covers ingredient costs plus a fixed dispensing fee.
- A capitation system provides a set monthly payment per eligible individual, varying by aid category and season.
- Understanding the impact of reimbursement models on pharmacist dispensing behavior is crucial for healthcare system efficiency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate changes in the rate and appropriateness of generic substitution following the implementation of a capitation reimbursement system for pharmacists.
- To compare dispensing behaviors in counties transitioning to capitation with those remaining under the FFS system.
Main Methods:
- A quasi-experimental design was used, comparing two rural counties that switched from FFS to capitation with two control counties that continued FFS.
- Pharmacist dispensing data were collected over a 1-year pre-period (FFS) and a 2-year post-period (capitation) in experimental counties.
- Appropriateness of generic substitution was assessed using explicit criteria.
Main Results:
- The experimental counties showed statistically significant increases in both the rate of generic substitution and the dollar savings per substitution after adopting capitation.
- No significant differences in the appropriateness of generic substitution were observed between the capitation and FFS reimbursement systems.
- Pharmacist dispensing behavior demonstrated a clear shift towards increased generic utilization under the capitation model.
Conclusions:
- Transitioning from fee-for-service to capitation reimbursement can effectively increase the rate and economic benefits of generic substitution among pharmacists.
- The shift in reimbursement models did not negatively impact the clinical appropriateness of generic drug choices.
- Capitation models offer a viable strategy for incentivizing cost-saving practices in pharmacy dispensing.