Association of human enteric pathogenicity and mouse lung toxicity of Escherichia coli

Acta Microbiologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae
|January 1, 1980
PubMed

Insights

Mouse lung toxicity was assessed in various bacterial strains, with serogroups O4 and O18 showing the highest lethality. A positive lung toxicity test in mice does not definitively indicate an etiological role in disease.

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Bacteriology
  • Pathogen Analysis

Background:

  • Bacterial lung toxicity is a significant concern in infectious disease research.
  • Understanding the pathogenicity of bacterial strains, including Escherichia coli, is crucial for diagnostics and treatment.
  • Various tests exist to assess bacterial virulence, but their correlation requires investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare mouse lung toxicity of bacterial strains with other pathogenicity tests.
  • To determine the correlation between lung toxicity, serogroup distribution, and other virulence factors.
  • To evaluate the diagnostic significance of mouse lung toxicity for identifying etiological agents.

Main Methods:

  • Assessed mouse lung toxicity in 439 bacterial strains (including Escherichia coli, Shigella, Enterobacter, Vibrio, and Klebsiella).
  • Compared lung toxicity results with mouse virulence, enterotoxicity, guinea pig eye test, serogroup, storage stability, origin, and hemolytic activity.
  • Analyzed data for significant differences based on serogroup, isolation source, and time.

Main Results:

  • Mouse lethality was highest in serogroups O4 and O18a,c, followed by O6, O20, O75, O115, and O147.
  • Numerous E. coli serogroups did not exhibit lung toxicity.
  • No significant correlation was found between mouse lung toxicity and other pathogenicity tests, nor between strains from healthy individuals and patients.

Conclusions:

  • Mouse lung toxicity varies significantly among bacterial serogroups, with O4 and O18 being particularly virulent.
  • A positive mouse lung toxicity test alone is insufficient to establish an etiological role for a bacterial agent.
  • Further research is needed to refine pathogenicity assessments and diagnostic criteria for bacterial infections.