Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Recertification in surgery, 1980

G E Cruft, J W Humphreys, R E Hermann

Archives of Surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)

|August 1, 1981

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

In their own words. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.

Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons·1999

Same author

Predicting the likelihood of residual disease in women treated for ductal carcinoma in situ.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons·1999

Same author

Trends in bile duct injuries from laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract·1998

Same author

Operations for gastric ulcer: a long-term study.

The American surgeon·1996

Same author

Monoethylglycinexylidide formation as an independent measure of warm hepatic ischemia and reperfusion injury.

The Journal of surgical research·1995

Same author

Fifty years of surgery for portal hypertension at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation. Lessons and prospects.

Annals of surgery·1995

Same journal

The White Test: A New Dye Test for Intraoperative Detection of Bile Leakage During Major Liver Resection-Invited Critique.

Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)·2017

Same journal

Use of Vascular Clamping in Hepatic Surgery: Lessons Learned From 1260 Liver Resections-Invited Critique.

Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)·2017

Same journal

Randomized Clinical Trial of Small-Incision and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Patients With Symptomatic Cholecystolithiasis: Primary and Clinical Outcomes-Invited Critique.

Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)·2017

Same journal

Liver Resection With a New Multiprobe Bipolar Radiofrequency Device-Invited Critique.

Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)·2017

Same journal

Porcine and Bovine Surgical Products: Jewish, Muslim, and Hindu Perspectives-Invited Critique.

Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)·2017

Same journal

Neuroendocrine Liver Metastasis: Transplant as Part of Multimodality Liver-Directed Therapy-Reply.

Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)·2016

See all related articles

The American Board of Surgery recertification in 1980 successfully renewed 98.5% of diplomates. Younger surgeons and those in full-time academic practice achieved higher examination scores during this initial surgical recertification process.

Area of Science:

Medical Education
Surgical Recertification
Professional Standards

Background:

The American Board of Surgery implemented its inaugural recertification process in 1980.
This process aimed to ensure ongoing competency and adherence to professional standards among certified surgeons.

Observation:

The recertification involved credential review, peer evaluation, continuing education, operative experience documentation, and a multiple-choice examination.
Out of 478 diplomates who underwent the process, 471 (98.5%) were successfully recertified.

Findings:

The mean examination score was 82.8%, with a passing score of 67.2%.
Analysis revealed that younger diplomates and those in full-time academic surgical practice tended to achieve higher scores on the examination.

Related Experiment Videos

Implications:

The initial recertification process demonstrated a high success rate, validating the established criteria.
Findings suggest potential correlations between age, practice type (academic vs. non-academic), and examination performance in surgical recertification.
This data provides a baseline for future evaluations of surgical recertification effectiveness and demographic influences.