Quantitative tests enhance neurologic function assessment in clinical trials. Careful selection and evaluation of sensory and motor function tests are crucial for objective clinical trial evaluation.
Area of Science:
Neurology
Psychology
Clinical Trials
Background:
Traditionally, neurologists relied on qualitative methods for clinical trial assessment.
Quantitative tests, common in psychology, are increasingly augmenting qualitative evaluations in neurology.
The validity of quantitative methods in a clinical setting requires direct assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
To review and assess literature on asymptomatic human performance and quantitative neurologic function in clinical settings.
To identify and evaluate quantitative tests suitable for clinical neurologic trials.
To interpret the impact of various factors on test performance and reliability.
Main Methods:
Literature review of asymptomatic human performance and clinical quantitative neurologic function.
Assessment of tests for reproducibility, reliability, and validity.
Evaluation of examiner training, motivation, learning, handedness, age, and sex effects.
Main Results:
Quantitative tests measure various neurologic functions including mental state, strength, coordination, and simulated daily living activities.
Statistical strategies for data analysis, scoring, data reduction, and display are presented.
Carefully selected and evaluated sensory and motor function tests are essential for objective clinical trial evaluation.
Conclusions:
Quantitative tests offer objective measures for neurologic functions in clinical trials.
Further research is needed, but validated quantitative sensory and motor tests are vital for objective clinical trial outcomes.
The integration of quantitative methods promises more rigorous neurologic clinical trial evaluations.