Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A visual field screening protocol for glaucoma

S Rabin, P Kolesar, S M Podos

    American Journal of Ophthalmology
    |October 1, 1981
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The SAGA histone acetyltransferase module targets SMC5/6 to specific genes.

    Epigenetics & chromatin·2023
    Same author

    Molecular Insights into the Architecture of the Human SMC5/6 Complex.

    Journal of molecular biology·2020
    Same author

    The relationship between macular cell layer thickness and visual function in different stages of glaucoma.

    Eye (London, England)·2011
    Same author

    Massive Arsenotherapy and Intensive Arsenotherapy and Their Effects On the Syphilitic Pregnant Woman and the Newborn.

    Anais brasileiros de ginecologia·2010
    Same author

    Influence of treatment protocol on the long-term efficacy of argon laser trabeculoplasty.

    Journal of glaucoma·2009
    Same author

    Medical treatment of newly diagnosed open-angle glaucoma.

    Journal of glaucoma·2009
    Same journal

    Reply to Comment on "Clinicopathological and Imaging Distinction Between Ocular Adnexal MALT Lymphoma and IgG4-Related Ophthalmic Disease".

    American journal of ophthalmology·2026
    Same journal

    Comment on: Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma Patients With Delayed Follow-Up.

    American journal of ophthalmology·2026
    Same journal

    Corneal sensitivity changes and nerve plexus abnormalities in noninfectious anterior uveitis.

    American journal of ophthalmology·2026
    Same journal

    Role of Menopausal Hormone Therapy on Strabismus, Strabismus Surgery, and Reoperation Rates.

    American journal of ophthalmology·2026
    Same journal

    Forging Ahead: The Need for Improved Representation in Academic Ophthalmology.

    American journal of ophthalmology·2026
    Same journal

    Clinical Utility of Ultra-Widefield Swept-Source OCT for Intraocular Tumors: Comparison With Ultrasonography, SD-OCT, and MRI.

    American journal of ophthalmology·2026
    See all related articles

    This study evaluated an optimized visual field screening protocol for glaucoma detection. The protocol proved reliable and efficient for identifying early glaucomatous visual field defects in high-risk patients.

    Area of Science:

    • Ophthalmology
    • Optometry
    • Clinical Trials

    Background:

    • Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide.
    • Early detection of glaucomatous visual field defects is crucial for timely intervention.
    • Standard visual field testing can be time-consuming and may not always detect early-stage disease.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the reliability and efficiency of an optimized visual field screening protocol.
    • To determine the protocol's effectiveness in detecting early glaucomatous visual field defects.
    • To compare the protocol's performance against standard kinetic Goldmann perimetry.

    Main Methods:

    • Prospective evaluation of 145 eyes from 73 patients with elevated intraocular pressure.
    • Testing performed on a manual Goldmann perimeter.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison between kinetic Goldmann perimetry (control) and an optimized visual field screening protocol (suprathreshold static technique).
  • Main Results:

    • Kinetic Goldmann perimetry identified 43 eyes with glaucomatous defects.
    • The optimized screening protocol detected 39 defective eyes.
    • The protocol demonstrated a false-negative rate of just under 10%, consistent with predictions, and one false-positive test.

    Conclusions:

    • The computer-generated optimal visual field screening protocols performed as predicted.
    • The optimized protocol is an excellent and efficient screening technique for early glaucomatous visual field defects.
    • This method offers a reliable approach for identifying patients requiring further glaucoma evaluation.