Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Splenic preservation following splenic trauma

A C Traub, J F Perry

    The Journal of Trauma
    |June 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary

    Splenic preservation in trauma patients is safer than splenectomy, significantly reducing sepsis and mortality risks. This approach is technically feasible for hemodynamically stable patients.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Letter from Dr. Perry; Gastro-Intestinal Catarrh.

    Daniel's Texas medical journal·2023
    Same author

    Stereoscopic display using rapid varifocal mirror oscillations.

    Applied optics·2010
    Same author

    Current approaches to the diagnosis and management of hepatocellular carcinoma.

    Clinical and experimental medicine·2005
    Same author

    The effect of a computer assisted instructional program on physical therapy students.

    Journal of allied health·1997
    Same author

    Thoracic spinal fractures and aortic rupture: a significant and fatal association.

    The Annals of thoracic surgery·1990
    Same author

    Blunt trauma in adults and children: a comparative analysis.

    The Journal of trauma·1990

    Area of Science:

    • Trauma Surgery
    • Surgical Oncology
    • Emergency Medicine

    Background:

    • Overwhelming post-splenectomy sepsis is a serious concern.
    • Interest in splenic preservation for abdominal trauma is increasing.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of splenic preservation versus splenectomy in patients with splenic trauma.

    Main Methods:

    • Retrospective review of 272 patients with splenic trauma over 6 years.
    • Comparison of outcomes between 41 patients who underwent splenic preservation and those who had splenectomy.
    • Analysis of mortality, morbidity, pulmonary complications, sepsis, and operative time.

    Main Results:

    • Mortality rates were significantly lower with splenic preservation (4.9%) compared to splenectomy (23.4%).
    • Sepsis occurred less frequently in the splenic preservation group (4.9% vs. 8.7%).
    • Pulmonary complications and overall morbidity were similar, with atelectasis more common after preservation.

    Conclusions:

    • Splenic preservation is a technically safe procedure for hemodynamically stable patients with splenic trauma.
    • Preservation reduces the risk of sepsis and mortality compared to splenectomy.
    • Careful surgical technique is crucial for successful splenic repair.

    Related Experiment Videos