Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Continuous flow and conventional resectoscope methods in transurethral prostatectomy: comparative study

S M Flechner, R D Williams

    The Journal of Urology
    |February 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Characterization of transient noise in Advanced LIGO relevant to gravitational wave signal GW150914.

    Classical and quantum gravity·2020
    Same author

    GW150914: First results from the search for binary black hole coalescence with Advanced LIGO.

    Physical review. D. (2016)·2020
    Same author

    Let the river erode! Enabling lateral migration increases geomorphic unit diversity.

    The Science of the total environment·2020
    Same author

    Tests of General Relativity with GW170817.

    Physical review letters·2019
    Same author

    Constraining the p-Mode-g-Mode Tidal Instability with GW170817.

    Physical review letters·2019
    Same author

    Search for Subsolar-Mass Ultracompact Binaries in Advanced LIGO's First Observing Run.

    Physical review letters·2018
    Same journal

    Editorial Comment.

    The Journal of urology·2026
    Same journal

    Editorial Comment.

    The Journal of urology·2026
    Same journal

    Editorial Comment.

    The Journal of urology·2026
    Same journal

    Uro-Science.

    The Journal of urology·2026
    Same journal

    Editorial Comment.

    The Journal of urology·2026
    Same journal

    Editorial Comment.

    The Journal of urology·2026
    See all related articles

    A study comparing continuous flow resectoscopes to conventional ones found no significant differences in blood loss, resection rate, or irrigant absorption during prostate surgery. Surgeon preference remains key for instrument selection.

    Area of Science:

    • Urology
    • Surgical Technology
    • Minimally Invasive Procedures

    Background:

    • Continuous flow resectoscopes are marketed as improvements over conventional models for transurethral prostate resection.
    • Claims include reduced blood loss, faster resection times, and less irrigant absorption.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To objectively compare the clinical outcomes of continuous flow resectoscopes versus conventional resectoscopes.
    • To evaluate differences in blood loss, resection time and rate, and irrigant absorption.

    Main Methods:

    • A randomized study involving 36 patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate.
    • Patients were divided into two groups: 20 using the continuous flow resectoscope and 16 using the conventional resectoscope.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding blood loss.
    • Resection rate and irrigant absorption also showed no significant variations between the continuous flow and conventional resectoscope groups.

    Conclusions:

    • The purported advantages of continuous flow resectoscopes were not substantiated by this study's findings.
    • Surgeon preference is identified as the primary factor influencing the choice of resectoscope, rather than demonstrable clinical superiority.