Neonatal sepsis resulting from possible amniotic fluid infection: risk and detection
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

Modeling Encephalopathy of Prematurity Using Prenatal Hypoxia-ischemia with Intra-amniotic Lipopolysaccharide in Rats
Published on: November 20, 2015
Insights
Prophylactic antibiotics for neonates at risk of infection are often overused. Laboratory tests, like the immature/total neutrophil (I/T) ratio, are more effective than clinical signs in identifying neonatal sepsis.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal Medicine
- Pediatric Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Pathology
Background:
- Antibiotics are commonly given prophylactically to neonates with infection risk factors.
- Risk factors include prolonged rupture of membranes, maternal fever, and preterm labor.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effectiveness of clinical risk factors versus laboratory tests in predicting neonatal infection.
- To evaluate the incidence of sepsis and infection in at-risk neonates.
Main Methods:
- Studied 276 neonates with risk factors for infection.
- Compared clinical signs with laboratory tests, including leukocyte count and immature/total neutrophil (I/T) ratio.
- Assessed the utility of a "sepsis screen" for diagnosing infection.
Main Results:
- Sepsis occurred in 6% of all neonates, higher in those with multiple risk factors.
- An elevated I/T ratio (≥0.2) indicated infection in 44% of cases.
- A positive sepsis screen was associated with 74% incidence of infection.
- Leukocyte count <5,000/cu mm or I/T ratio ≥0.2 showed 100% sensitivity for sepsis.
Conclusions:
- Starting antibiotics based solely on risk factors is not always appropriate.
- Laboratory tests, particularly leukocyte count and I/T ratio, can reduce indiscriminate antibiotic use in neonates.
- The sepsis screen is efficient for detecting neonatal infection.
Abstract:
Antibiotics are frequently prescribed "prophylactically" when the neonate is considered to be at risk for infection. The risk factors of prolonged rupture of membranes (greater than 24 hours), maternal fever/infection, and/or unexplained preterm labor (suggesting possible anmiotic fluid infection) were investigated in 276 babies. Only two of 150 babies investigated for a single factor proved to have sepsis, while of the 126 babies who had multiple factors, 13 had sepsis. Several laboratory tests, used singly or in combination, were more helpful than clinical manifestations in predicting which babies were likely to be infected. Neonatal sepsis was present in 6 per cent of the total, in 10 per cent of neonates with clinical signs, in 21 per cent with an increased immature/total neutrophil ratio (I/T ratio greater than or equal to 0.2), and in 36 per cent of infants with a positive "sepsis screen." The incidence of "infection" (sepsis and "very probable" infection) was 12 per cent overall, but was 14 per cent with neonatal signs, 44 per cent with I/T ratio greater than or equal to 0.2, and 74 per cent in those with a positive sepsis screen. A leukocyte count less than 5,000/cu mm and/or an I/T ratio greater than or equal to 0.2 was 100 per cent sensitive for sepsis, but the sepsis screen was most "efficient" at detecting "infection." Starting antibiotics on the basis of risk factors alone does not seem appropriate. In situations where amniotic fluid infection is possible, evaluation with the leukocyte count and differential (with or without other tests) could decrease the indiscriminate use of antibiotics, particularly when a single risk factor is the reason for suspecting infection.
Related Concept Videos
Development of the Oral Microbiota
Viral Meningitis
Bacterial Meningitis I: Introduction

