Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Is segmental sounder?

W O Griffen

    Diseases of the Colon and Rectum
    |May 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    The optimal surgical approach for colon cancer remains uncertain. While extensive operations were standard, a 1977 report suggested less radical procedures are equally effective, a claim this paper challenges, advocating for randomized trials.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The way it was.

    Surgery·2001
    Same author

    Creation, evaluation, and continuing assurance of excellence of the certified surgical specialist.

    World journal of surgery·2001
    Same author

    Decees in today's medicine.

    The American surgeon·1999
    Same author

    Medicine 101.

    Annals of surgery·1999
    Same author

    Stomal ulcer after gastric restrictive operations.

    Journal of the American College of Surgeons·1997
    Same author

    The "P-C" world of medicine: a commentary on the current medical scene.

    The American surgeon·1996
    Same journal

    A Penny for Your Thoughts.

    Diseases of the colon and rectum·2026
    Same journal

    June 2026 Translations.

    Diseases of the colon and rectum·2026
    Same journal

    Selected Abstracts.

    Diseases of the colon and rectum·2026
    Same journal

    Recurrence After Rectopexy: Insights From Magnetic Resonance Defecography.

    Diseases of the colon and rectum·2026
    Same journal

    Risk of Metabolic Disease After Right- vs Left-Sided Colectomy for Colon Cancer: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

    Diseases of the colon and rectum·2026
    Same journal

    Sexual Distress Is Common in Long Term Follow-up After Pelvic Pouch for Ulcerative Colitis: A Cross-Sectional Study.

    Diseases of the colon and rectum·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Oncology
    • Surgical Oncology
    • Gastrointestinal Surgery

    Background:

    • Historically, extensive surgical procedures for colon cancer involved early malignancy isolation, lymphadenectomy, and resection.
    • A 1977 report questioned the necessity of extensive surgery, proposing less radical approaches with lower morbidity.
    • This challenges the established surgical paradigms for colorectal carcinoma treatment.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To critically evaluate the validity of reports suggesting less radical surgical procedures for colon cancer are as effective as traditional extensive operations.
    • To review existing data and present arguments against the findings of the 1977 report.
    • To highlight the need for definitive evidence regarding the optimal surgical extent for colon cancer.

    Main Methods:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • Critical analysis of historical surgical techniques for colon carcinoma.
    • Review and refutation of data presented in a 1977 report on less radical surgical procedures.
    • Examination of retrospective data from various reported surgical series.

    Main Results:

    • The paper questions the validity of the 1977 report's conclusions.
    • Retrospective data reviewed tend to refute the claim that less radical procedures are equally effective.
    • The current evidence is insufficient to definitively determine the optimal surgical approach.

    Conclusions:

    • The definitive answer regarding the efficacy of less radical colon cancer surgery remains unknown due to the retrospective nature of existing studies.
    • There is a critical need for a sponsored, randomized, prospective clinical trial.
    • Such a trial is essential to ascertain if a less extensive operation can achieve the same cure rates as more radical procedures.