Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Carcinogenesis: a predictive structure-activity model

K Enslein, P N Craig

    Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health
    |October 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Optically phase-locked electronic speckle pattern interferometer.

    Applied optics·2010
    Same author

    A quantitative structure-toxicity relationships model for the dermal sensitization guinea pig maximization assay.

    Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association·1998
    Same author

    Assessment of n-octanol/water partition coefficient: when is the assessment reliable?

    Journal of chemical information and computer sciences·1996
    Same author

    Prediction of Salmonella mutagenicity.

    Mutagenesis·1996
    Same author

    Assessment of effect levels of chemicals from quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models. I. Chronic lowest-observed-adverse-effect level (LOAEL).

    Toxicology letters·1995
    Same author

    Assessment of developmental toxicity potential of chemicals by quantitative structure-toxicity relationship models.

    Chemosphere·1995
    Same journal

    Alterations of male Wistar rat jejunum induced by Dodine (n-dodecylguanidine acetate).

    Journal of toxicology and environmental health·1997
    Same journal

    Cadmium toxicity and distribution in metallothionein-I and -II deficient transgenic mice.

    Journal of toxicology and environmental health·1997
    Same journal

    Comparison of the binding potential of various diisocyanates on DNA in vitro.

    Journal of toxicology and environmental health·1997
    Same journal

    Investigation of the potential impact of benchmark dose and pharmacokinetic modeling in noncancer risk assessment.

    Journal of toxicology and environmental health·1997
    Same journal

    Effect of cypermethrin on isolated male and female rat hepatocytes.

    Journal of toxicology and environmental health·1997
    Same journal

    Assessment of environmental hazards of 1,3,5-trinitrobenzene.

    Journal of toxicology and environmental health·1997
    See all related articles

    A new statistical model predicts chemical carcinogenicity using structural features. This approach aids in assessing cancer risk for chemicals lacking experimental data, achieving high classification accuracy.

    Area of Science:

    • Computational toxicology
    • Structure-activity relationships (SAR)

    Background:

    • Assessing chemical carcinogenicity is crucial for public health.
    • Experimental carcinogenesis assays are time-consuming and resource-intensive.
    • Predictive models can aid in prioritizing chemicals for testing.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To develop a statistical structure-activity equation for estimating carcinogenic potential.
    • To predict carcinogenicity for chemicals without prior assay data.

    Main Methods:

    • Developed a discriminant equation based on substructural fragments and molecular weight.
    • Utilized data from 343 compounds sourced from International Agency for Research on Cancer monographs.
    • Employed a statistical approach to classify compounds as carcinogenic or non-carcinogenic.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • The model achieved 87-91% accuracy for classifying carcinogens.
    • Non-carcinogen classification accuracy ranged from 78-80%.
    • A small percentage of compounds (5.5-10.2%) remained unclassifiable, with low false negative (4-5%) and false positive (near 11%) rates.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed statistical equation effectively estimates carcinogenic potential.
    • This SAR model offers a valuable tool for preliminary carcinogenicity assessment.
    • The model supports risk evaluation for chemicals lacking experimental data.