Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Human auditory nerve action potentials and brain stem evoked responses

A C Coats

    Archives of Otolaryngology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)
    |December 1, 1978
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Immersed false vertical room. A new motion sickness model.

    Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation·1998
    Same author

    Inverted immersion as a novel gravitoinertial environment.

    Aviation, space, and environmental medicine·1995
    Same author

    Computer-quantified positional nystagmus in normals.

    American journal of otolaryngology·1993
    Same author

    Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in a nonhuman primate. I. Basic features and relations to other emissions.

    Hearing research·1988
    Same author

    Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in a nonhuman primate. II. Cochlear anatomy.

    Hearing research·1988
    Same author

    Otoacoustic emissions in ears with hearing loss.

    American journal of otolaryngology·1987

    Auditory nerve action potential (AP) and brainstem evoked response (BER) latency-intensity functions reveal distinct patterns related to hearing loss. Retrocochlear abnormalities significantly prolong N1-V intervals, offering a reliable diagnostic sign.

    Area of Science:

    • Neuroscience
    • Audiology
    • Otoacoustic Emissions

    Background:

    • Understanding auditory nerve action potential (AP) and brainstem evoked response (BER) function is crucial for diagnosing hearing impairments.
    • Latency-intensity (L-i) functions provide insights into neural pathway integrity.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the relationship between L-i functions of AP N1 peak, BER V peak, and the N1-V interval with hearing level and lesion location.
    • To differentiate between cochlear and retrocochlear hearing abnormalities using electrophysiological measures.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of L-i functions for AP N1 peak, BER V peak, and N1-V interval.
    • Correlation of these functions with audiometric hearing levels (4-8 kHz) and lesion site (cochlear vs. retrocochlear).

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • AP L-i curves steepen with increasing high-frequency hearing loss, consistent across cochlear and retrocochlear ears (except with inappropriate AP preservation).
    • Both high-frequency cochlear loss and retrocochlear abnormalities prolong V peak latency, with retrocochlear issues causing greater prolongation.
    • Cochlear loss leads to decreasing N1-V intervals and increasing L-i slopes with rising hearing levels; retrocochlear abnormalities significantly prolong N1-V intervals.

    Conclusions:

    • N1-V interval prolongation is a highly reliable indicator of retrocochlear abnormality, slightly more so than V peak prolongation.
    • L-i function analysis of AP and BER provides valuable information for differentiating cochlear from retrocochlear hearing loss.