Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

A conversion code from ICHPPC-1 to ICHPPC-2

L A Becker, R M Boyle, J Froom

The Journal of Family Practice

|April 1, 1981

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Adopting a Family-Oriented Approach: Innovations in primary care.

Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien·2011

Same author

The effects of Cannabis sativa L. seed (hempseed) in the ovariectomized rat model of menopause.

Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology·2010

Same author

How can a proposed Cochrane diet and nutrition field work effectively?

European journal of clinical nutrition·2005

Same author

A cross-national study of acute otitis media: risk factors, severity, and treatment at initial visit. Report from the International Primary Care Network (IPCN) and the Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network (ASPN).

The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice·2002

Same author

Are fluid-based cytologies superior to the conventional Papanicolaou test? A systematic review.

The Journal of family practice·2001

Same author

Are beta2-agonists effective treatment for acute bronchitis or acute cough in patients without underlying pulmonary disease? A systematic review.

The Journal of family practice·2001

Same journal

Does taking BP medicine at night (vs morning) result in fewer cardiovascular events?

The Journal of family practice·2023

Same journal

Preventing RSV in children and adults: A vaccine update.

The Journal of family practice·2023

Same journal

Essential oils: How safe? How effective?

The Journal of family practice·2023

Same journal

51-year-old woman • History of Graves disease • General fatigue, palpitations, and hand tremors • Dx?

The Journal of family practice·2023

Same journal

Renewing the dream.

The Journal of family practice·2023

Same journal

55-year-old woman • Myalgias and progressive symmetrical proximal weakness • History of unilateral renal agenesis, type 2 diabetes, and hyperlipidemia • Dx?

The Journal of family practice·2023

See all related articles

Faculty members created a definitive conversion from ICHPPC-1 to ICHPPC-2. This study provides a conversion code and discusses differences between the two primary care classification systems.

Area of Science:

Primary Care Medicine
Medical Informatics
Health Classification Systems

Background:

The International Classification of Health Problems in Primary Care (ICHPPC) is a crucial tool for primary care data.
Evolution of medical classifications necessitates updates and conversions to maintain relevance and accuracy.
ICHPPC-1 to ICHPPC-2 transition required a systematic approach to ensure data continuity.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop a definitive conversion code between the first (ICHPPC-1) and second (ICHPPC-2) versions of the International Classification of Health Problems in Primary Care.
To provide a detailed mapping of ICHPPC-1 diagnostic titles to their ICHPPC-2 equivalents.
To analyze and discuss the key differences between ICHPPC-1 and ICHPPC-2.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

Collaboration between faculty members from four family medicine departments.

Systematic review and mapping of diagnostic titles from ICHPPC-1 to ICHPPC-2.

Development of a detailed conversion code facilitating the transition between classification versions.

Main Results:

A comprehensive conversion code is presented, linking each ICHPPC-1 diagnostic title to its corresponding ICHPPC-2 equivalent.
Key differences in diagnostic terminology and structure between ICHPPC-1 and ICHPPC-2 have been identified and discussed.
The study offers practical suggestions for utilizing the conversion code in research and clinical practice.

Conclusions:

The developed conversion code provides a reliable method for transitioning data from ICHPPC-1 to ICHPPC-2.
Understanding the differences between the two versions is essential for accurate interpretation of primary care data.
This work facilitates improved data comparability and analysis in primary care research and practice.