Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison of methods for estimating digoxin dosing regimens

M L Hyneck, M H Johnson, J G Wagner

    American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy
    |January 1, 1981
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Relationships Between the Infrapatellar Fat Pad and Patellofemoral Joint Osteoarthritis Differ With Body Mass Index and Sex.

    Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society·2025
    Same author

    Menstrual Abnormalities, Nutritional Patterns, and Body Composition in Female Classical Ballet Dancers.

    The Physician and sportsmedicine·2016
    Same author

    Enhanced allergic airway disease in old mice is associated with a Th17 response.

    Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology·2014
    Same author

    Methods and strategies for gene structure curation in WormBase.

    Database : the journal of biological databases and curation·2011
    Same author

    The post-war rehabilitation of science.

    The Medical journal of Australia·2010
    Same author

    Comparison of the in vitro and in vivo release of digoxin from four different soft gelatin capsule formulations.

    Journal of pharmacokinetics and biopharmaceutics·2010

    Predicting serum digoxin concentrations (SDCs) using common formulas showed poor accuracy. The study found no significant differences between methods, highlighting severe limitations in current predictive formulas for SDCs.

    Area of Science:

    • Pharmacokinetics
    • Clinical Chemistry
    • Biostatistics

    Background:

    • Accurate prediction of serum digoxin concentrations (SDCs) is crucial for therapeutic drug monitoring.
    • Existing methods for estimating SDCs often rely on creatinine clearance (Clcr) calculations.
    • Variability in patient factors can impact the reliability of these predictive models.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the predictive reliability of five different methods for estimating SDCs.
    • To evaluate the impact of three distinct Clcr estimation equations on SDC prediction accuracy.
    • To analyze how factors like dose absorption and Clcr determination methods influence SDC prediction.

    Main Methods:

    • Radioimmunoassay was used to determine actual nadir SDCs in 79 adult patients.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Creatinine clearance (Clcr) was estimated using three equations incorporating age, lean body weight, and serum creatinine.
  • Five distinct equations were employed to predict SDCs based on estimated Clcr values.

    • Main Results:

    • No substantial differences in predictive reliability were observed among the five SDC prediction methods.
    • Poor correlations (r < 0.70) were found between observed and calculated SDCs across all methods.
    • Predictive accuracy was not significantly affected by gender, fraction of dose absorbed, or Clcr estimation method.

    Conclusions:

    • The formulas studied for predicting serum digoxin concentrations exhibit severe limitations.
    • Current predictive models demonstrate inadequate accuracy for clinical application.
    • Further research is needed to develop more reliable methods for estimating SDCs.