Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

On making clinical research count

S Lippmann, W Regan

    Southern Medical Journal
    |March 1, 1981
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    High-quality scientific research relies on robust study design, which is inconsistently applied. Improving research quality requires better training in research design and critical evaluation of scientific publications.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Prenatal presentation of fetal bradycardia and long QT syndrome.

    Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2026
    Same author

    Fabrication of shallow EUV gratings on silicon by irradiation with helium ions.

    Nanotechnology·2025
    Same author

    Countering antimicrobial resistance.

    Pulmonology·2025
    Same author

    Electric pulse heating device for the analysis of solid/solid phase transformations.

    The Review of scientific instruments·2021
    Same author

    Results of 115 Rubis II reverse thumb carpometacarpal joint prostheses with a mean follow-up of 10 years.

    The Journal of hand surgery, European volume·2017
    Same author

    Tunable phonon polaritons in atomically thin van der Waals crystals of boron nitride.

    Science (New York, N.Y.)·2014
    Same journal

    The Five Essential Concepts of Developmental Medicine: A Medical Paradigm for People with Developmental Disabilities.

    Southern medical journal·2026
    Same journal

    α-Gal Syndrome in the South: Why We Need Treatment Trials, Not Just Tick Prevention.

    Southern medical journal·2026
    Same journal

    Association between Main Pancreatic Duct Size, Comorbidities, and Fistula Formation after Whipple Procedure for Pancreatic Cancer.

    Southern medical journal·2026
    Same journal

    Impact of Temperature Variation on Patients with Acute Severe Asthma.

    Southern medical journal·2026
    Same journal

    Assessing the Accuracy and Reliability of ChatGPT-4 to Answer Clinical EHR Messages in Sports Medicine.

    Southern medical journal·2026
    Same journal

    Diagnostic Utility and Clinical Implications of Inpatient Fecal Occult Blood Testing.

    Southern medical journal·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Scientific methodology
    • Research integrity

    Background:

    • Sound research design principles are inconsistently applied in scientific investigations.
    • A perceived trend favors rapid publication over rigorous experimental control.
    • Clinicians often lack adequate preparation to critically assess research quality and clinical relevance.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To highlight the inconsistent application of research design principles.
    • To emphasize the need for improved critical appraisal skills among clinicians and researchers.
    • To advocate for enhanced education in research design and scientific writing interpretation.

    Main Methods:

    • This study is a critical review of current research practices and educational needs.
    • Analysis of the gap between ideal research standards and actual implementation.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Synthesis of expert opinions and calls for reform in scientific publishing.

    • Main Results:

    • Inconsistent application of research design principles compromises scientific quality.
    • A significant gap exists in clinicians' ability to critically evaluate research.
    • There is a growing awareness and demand for improved research rigor and transparency.

    Conclusions:

    • Strengthening the application of research design is crucial for scientific advancement.
    • Enhanced education in research methodology and critical appraisal is urgently needed for both researchers and clinicians.
    • Authors must clearly articulate methods and clinical relevance to improve scientific communication and impact.