Related Experiment Videos
Risk taking through the adult life span
Experimental Aging Research
|October 1, 1980
Summary
This study challenges the idea that older adults are always more cautious. Findings suggest age differences in risk-taking may depend on the measurement tool used, not just age.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Gerontology
- Cognitive Science
Background:
- Research on adult cautiousness often uses extreme age groups and limited measures.
- Psychometric properties of risk-taking scales are not well-established.
- The notion of increasing cautiousness with age is prevalent but under-examined.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate age-related differences in risk-taking behavior across the adult lifespan.
- To evaluate the reliability and validity of different risk-taking measures.
- To challenge the assumption of universal age-related increases in cautiousness.
Main Methods:
- Administered three distinct risk-taking measures to a broad adult age sample (18-78 years).
- Assessed scale reliability (internal consistency) and convergent validity.
- Analyzed age differences using dichotomous and continuous scoring.
Main Results:
- The Choice Dilemmas Questionnaire demonstrated low reliability compared to other measures.
- Convergent validity was found between the Choice Dilemmas Questionnaire and the Risk Taking Questionnaire, but not the Vocabulary Risk Test.
- Significant age differences in risk-taking emerged only on the Choice Dilemmas Questionnaire with dichotomous scoring.
Conclusions:
- Scale properties, particularly reliability, may significantly influence observed age differences in risk-taking.
- The study questions the generalized belief that older adults are consistently more cautious.
- Future research should prioritize robust psychometric properties of measures when examining age and risk-taking.