Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026
09:12
The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
Published on: July 4, 2013
Racial intolerance in a correctional institution: an ecological view
The American Journal of Psychiatry
|August 1, 1981
Summary
Social factors significantly influence racial intolerance among adolescents. Different ethnic groups exhibited distinct adaptation patterns, with some promoting cohesion and others conflict.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Criminology
- Adolescent Development
Background:
- Racial intolerance is a complex issue influenced by social dynamics.
- Understanding group behavior in institutional settings is crucial for addressing conflict.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the role of social factors in racial intolerance.
- To examine relational behavior, ethnicity, group status, peer acceptance, and cohesion in an adolescent correctional setting.
Main Methods:
- Observational study within an adolescent correctional institution.
- Analysis of relational behavior across different ethnic groups.
- Assessment of group dynamics, including cohesion and leadership.
Main Results:
- Hispanic (Chicano) adolescents formed a cohesive group with strong norm conformity and inclusive leadership.
- White adolescents exhibited disorganized group structures with leaders engaging in antagonistic behavior.
- Black adolescents demonstrated high cohesion, with leaders actively participating in both racial cooperation and conflict.
Conclusions:
- Social and relational factors significantly shape ethnic group dynamics and racial intolerance.
- Group cohesion and leadership styles play a critical role in adaptation patterns.
- Adolescent correctional institutions present a unique environment for studying intergroup relations.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
03:20The Stanford Prison Experiment
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
01:08Obedience
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation, obedience...
01:31In- and Out-Groups
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
02:55Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who are...
02:16Stereotype Content Model
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence categorization, a person will feel...
04:49Robbers Cave
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension could be...