Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

Murine Appendectomy Model of Chronic Colitis Associated Colorectal Cancer by Precise Localization of Caecal Patch
Published on: August 24, 2019
Perforated appendix and antibiotics
Insights
Clindamycin and gentamicin were more effective than penicillin and streptomycin for treating perforated appendicitis in children, leading to fewer and less severe complications. This antibiotic regimen reduced treatment time and hospital stays for pediatric appendicitis patients.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Infectious Diseases
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Perforated appendicitis in children often leads to severe suppurative complications.
- Antibiotic selection is crucial for managing pediatric appendicitis outcomes.
- Previous treatments may not adequately address anaerobic bacterial infections.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of two antibiotic regimens in treating perforated appendicitis in children.
- To evaluate the incidence and severity of suppurative complications.
- To assess the impact on hospital stay duration.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial involving 60 children with perforated appendicitis.
- Group 1: Penicillin and streptomycin.
- Group 2: Clindamycin and gentamicin.
Main Results:
- The clindamycin and gentamicin group experienced fewer and less severe suppurative complications.
- Hospital days for complications were three times greater in the penicillin and streptomycin group.
- Bacteroides fragilis was frequently isolated in severe infections not treated with clindamycin.
- Two patients (2/28) in the clindamycin group developed severe diarrhea.
Conclusions:
- Clindamycin and gentamicin offer a superior treatment option for perforated appendicitis in children compared to penicillin and streptomycin.
- This regimen is associated with reduced complication rates, severity, and healthcare resource utilization.
- Effective management of anaerobic infections, such as those caused by Bacteroides fragilis, is critical.
Abstract:
60 consecutive children operated for perforated appendicitis were treated randomly with either penicillin and streptomycin or with clindamycin and gentamycin. Suppurative complications occurred somewhat more often and were definitely more severe in the former group. The number of hospital days spent in the treatment of these complications were three times as great in the former than in the latter group. Bacteroides fragilis could be isolated in most of the severe infections treated without clindamycin. Two out of 28 patients treated with clindamycin presented with severe diarrhoea.
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction
The location of esophageal perforation can vary, occurring anywhere along the esophagus.
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Appendicitis-I: Introduction
Etiology: Appendicitis can arise from various causes, primarily rooted in the obstruction of the appendix lumen. Factors contributing to this obstruction include fecal accumulation, lymphoid hyperplasia and, in...
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease I: Ulcerative Colitis
Inflammatory bowel disease, or IBD, encompasses a group of disorders characterized by chronic inflammation or ulceration of the gastrointestinal tract.
Risk Factors
The exact cause of IBD remains unclear, although it is believed to be due to a mix of genetic, environmental, microbial, and immune factors. Genetic factors are significant in determining susceptibility to IBD, with family history being a critical risk factor. Individuals with a first-degree relative who has IBD are at...
Appendicitis

