Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 4, 2026

A Piglet Model of Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy
Published on: May 16, 2015
Sudden and unexpected death in infancy and childhood: neuropathological findings
Insights
Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) diagnosis requires thorough historical and pathological review. Neuropathological findings in SIDS victims are not suitable for comparison with children who had an established cause of death.
Area of Science:
- Neuropathology
- Pediatric Pathology
- Forensic Pathology
Background:
- Sudden and unexpected deaths in infants and children present diagnostic challenges.
- Distinguishing between sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and deaths with an established cause (CODE) is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe neuropathological findings in a cohort of infants and children with sudden, unexpected deaths.
- To evaluate the utility of historical, clinical, and pathological data in differentiating SIDS from CODE.
- To assess the suitability of CODE brains as controls for SIDS neuropathology.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 58 cases of sudden and unexpected death in infants and children.
- Detailed review of historical, clinical, laboratory, and post-mortem pathological findings.
- Categorization into SIDS and CODE subgroups based on comprehensive data.
Main Results:
- Over 50% of cases were classified as SIDS.
- Focal lesions and diffuse glial reactive hypertrophy were observed in 64% of children under 9 months, irrespective of SIDS or CODE.
- These neuropathological changes were not consistently correlated with clinical data, except for perinatal asphyxia.
- Brains from CODE cases are not appropriate controls for SIDS neuropathology studies.
Conclusions:
- Accurate SIDS diagnosis relies heavily on excluding other causes through meticulous historical and pathological examination.
- Common neuropathological findings in young children (<9 months) do not reliably differentiate SIDS from CODE.
- The brains of children with an established cause of death should not be used as controls in SIDS neuropathological research.
Abstract:
This report describes the neuropathological findings in 58 infants and children dying suddenly and unexpectedly. Utilizing historical, clinical, laboratory and pathological findings, two subgroups were distinguished: in one a cause of death was established (CODE); members of the other (more than 50% of the total sample) were victims of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). The importance of historical as well as pathological data in excluding SIDS is stressed. In each subgroup, both focal lesions and diffuse glial reactive hypertrophy were identified in 64% of all children below 9 months of age. These changes were not related to age group or maturation and, except for a history of perinatal asphyxia, lesions were not predictably correlated with clinical data. The brains of children dying of established cause (CODE) are not a suitable control group with which to compare those of SIDS.
Related Concept Videos
Neurulation
Necrosis
Morphological Manifestations of Necrosis
Necrotic cells show different types of morphological appearance depending on the type of tissue and infection. In coagulative necrosis, cells become anucleated and die, but their...
Encephalitis ll: Pathophysiology

