Partial reinforcement and extinction of vasomotor conditioning. A test of cognitive and two-factor theories

In order to investigate cognitive versus traditional accounts of responding in extinction and the discrimination hypothesis for the partial reinforcement effect, 40 human subjects were randomly divided into two groups and were treated according to thermal vasomotor conditioning procedures using either 25 trials of continuous reinforcement or 100 trials of 25% partial reinforcement. At the onset of extinction, half of each group was given traditional noninformed extinction, while the other (informed) half had the thermal stimulator removed. The usual greater resistance to extinction was obtained after partial reinforcement than after continuous reinforcement in the two noninformed groups, however, immediate extinction of responding was obtained from the first extinction trial in the two informed groups. These results are consistent both with the discrimination hypothesis for the partial reinforcement extinction effect and with cognitive explanations of responding in extinction. Consequences for the behavioral therapies are discussed.