Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Absorbed dose in xeromammography

P Zárand, Z Péntek

    The British Journal of Radiology
    |February 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Xeroradiography significantly reduces radiation dose compared to conventional mammography, offering a safer breast imaging option. This method also proves more cost-effective due to lower consumable expenses per image.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    False-positive results in mammographic screening for breast cancer in Europe: a literature review and survey of service screening programmes.

    Journal of medical screening·2012
    Same author

    Mammographic screening programmes in Europe: organization, coverage and participation.

    Journal of medical screening·2012
    Same author

    The organisation and results of first screening round of the Hungarian nationwide organised breast cancer screening programme.

    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2007
    Same author

    Difficulties in the diagnosis of intracystic tumors of the female breast.

    Neoplasma·2007
    Same author

    Diagnostic accuracy of mammography and contrast-enhanced MR imaging in 238 histologically verified breast lesions.

    Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987)·1997
    Same author

    On the measurement of the effective linear attenuation coefficient mueff in 60Co wedge fields.

    Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]·1996

    Area of Science:

    • Radiology
    • Medical Imaging
    • Radiation Oncology

    Background:

    • Mammography is a crucial tool for breast cancer screening.
    • Conventional mammography involves specific radiation parameters (30 kV, Mo anode, 0.03 mm Mo filter).
    • Evaluating alternative imaging techniques for dose reduction and cost-effectiveness is essential.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the average absorbed dose and skin exposure between conventional mammography and xeroradiography.
    • To assess the cost-effectiveness of xeroradiography versus film-mammography.

    Main Methods:

    • Comparison of radiation parameters: conventional mammography (30 kV, Mo anode, 0.03 mm Mo filter) versus xeroradiography (38--42 kV, W anode, 1--2 mm Al total filtration).
    • Measurement and comparison of average absorbed dose per image.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of consumable costs per image.

    • Main Results:

    • Average absorbed dose for xeroradiography is 4--5 mGy, approximately four times lower than conventional film-mammography.
    • Xeroradiography dose is comparable to DuPont "Lo Dose I" but higher than Kodak "Mini-R" and 3M "Trimax-rare earth" systems.
    • Consumable costs for xeroradiography are about nine times cheaper than for film-mammography.

    Conclusions:

    • Xeroradiography offers a substantial reduction in radiation dose compared to conventional mammography.
    • The cost savings associated with xeroradiography make it an economically attractive alternative.
    • Further research may be warranted to optimize xeroradiography dose levels in comparison to other advanced systems.