Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Announcing the great frame-tilt judging contest

B J Fine

    Perceptual and Motor Skills
    |April 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Investigator bias in rod-and-frame studies is a critical flaw. The person conducting the experiment, not the participant, determines the frame tilt direction, leading to errors.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Farnsworth-Munsell 100-hue test and learning: reestablishing the priority of a discovery.

    Applied optics·2010
    Same author

    Perindopril and physiologic responses to exercise.

    Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology·1994
    Same author

    Effects of caffeine or diphenhydramine on visual vigilance.

    Psychopharmacology·1994
    Same author

    Effects of caffeine and diphenhydramine on auditory evoked cortical potentials.

    Perceptual and motor skills·1993
    Same author

    Oral contraceptive use, caffeine consumption, field-dependence, and the discrimination of colors.

    Perceptual and motor skills·1991
    Same author

    In reply: meta-analysis and bias.

    Science (New York, N.Y.)·1990

    Area of Science:

    • Perception science
    • Psychophysics

    Background:

    • Rod-and-frame task is a standard psychophysical method.
    • Previous studies have not addressed investigator bias in defining frame tilt direction.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To highlight the methodological error of investigator-defined frame tilt in rod-and-frame studies.
    • To emphasize the impact of this bias on the interpretation of results.

    Main Methods:

    • A contest was devised to illustrate the concept of investigator bias.
    • The methodology of standard rod-and-frame studies was critically reviewed.

    Main Results:

    • The investigator, not the observer, consistently defines the direction of frame tilt.
    • This introduces a significant, unacknowledged bias into the study design.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Conclusions:

    • The investigator's role in defining frame tilt direction represents a serious theoretical and methodological error.
    • Revising the methodology is crucial for accurate rod-and-frame study outcomes.