Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Earspeaker coupling effects on auditory action potential and brainstem responses

A C Coats, H R Kidder

    Archives of Otolaryngology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)
    |June 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Immersed false vertical room. A new motion sickness model.

    Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation·1998
    Same author

    Inverted immersion as a novel gravitoinertial environment.

    Aviation, space, and environmental medicine·1995
    Same author

    Computer-quantified positional nystagmus in normals.

    American journal of otolaryngology·1993
    Same author

    Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in a nonhuman primate. I. Basic features and relations to other emissions.

    Hearing research·1988
    Same author

    Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in a nonhuman primate. II. Cochlear anatomy.

    Hearing research·1988
    Same author

    Otoacoustic emissions in ears with hearing loss.

    American journal of otolaryngology·1987
    Same journal

    Lidocaine in the treatment of Meniere's disease.

    Archives of otolaryngology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)·1985
    Same journal

    Irradiation after neck dissection.

    Archives of otolaryngology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)·1985
    Same journal

    Forehead lift.

    Archives of otolaryngology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)·1985
    Same journal

    Laryngeal cyst of the thyroid cartilage.

    Archives of otolaryngology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)·1985
    Same journal

    Metabolic facial paralysis in an infant.

    Archives of otolaryngology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)·1985
    Same journal

    Effects of magnetic resonance imaging fields on stapedectomy prostheses.

    Archives of otolaryngology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)·1985
    See all related articles

    Different earphone coupling methods significantly alter auditory evoked potential measurements. These variations in auditory nerve action potential and brainstem evoked response functions are linked to distinct click frequency spectra.

    Area of Science:

    • Neuroscience
    • Audiology
    • Biomedical Engineering

    Background:

    • Auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) are crucial for assessing auditory pathway function.
    • Standardized measurement techniques are essential for reliable AEP interpretation.
    • Earphone coupling methods can influence acoustic stimulus delivery and signal characteristics.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the impact of different earphone coupling methods on human auditory nerve action potential (AP) and brainstem evoked response (BER) input-output functions.
    • To determine if variations in AEPs due to coupling methods are predictable.
    • To analyze the role of click frequency spectra in observed differences.

    Main Methods:

    • Obtained input-output functions for auditory nerve N1 and brainstem V peaks using three common earphone coupling methods: free field, circumaural cushions, and standard audiometric cushions.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Maintained consistent stimulus values across conditions.
  • Analyzed amplitude-intensity and latency-intensity functions.

    • Main Results:

    • Substantially different amplitude-intensity and latency-intensity functions were observed for both auditory nerve N1 and brainstem V peaks across the three coupling conditions.
    • The observed differences in input-output functions were predictable based on variations in the click frequency spectra produced by each coupling method.

    Conclusions:

    • Earphone coupling significantly affects auditory evoked potential amplitude and latency measurements.
    • Understanding these coupling-dependent differences is vital for accurate AEP interpretation in clinical and research settings.
    • Click frequency spectrum analysis provides a basis for predicting these measurement variations.