Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Report of the Consensus Conference on the Diagnosis of Auditory Processing Disorders in School-Aged Children.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2000
Same author

Habilitation and management of auditory processing disorders: overview of selected procedures.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·1999
Same author

Duplex perception: some initial findings concerning its neural basis.

Brain and cognition·1989
Same author

Research trends in the field of speech and hearing.

Journal of communication disorders·1979
Same author

The fit between journals and theses.

Journal of communication disorders·1978
Same author

Identification of vowels with equated intensity. A preliminary study.

Journal of the American Audiology Society·1977

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 26, 2026

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
09:13

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

Auditory pattern recognition abilities of aphasic and normal subjects: a preliminary study

P H Ptacek, D Breintenfeldt, F Musiek

    Journal of Communication Disorders
    |December 1, 1978
    PubMed
    Summary

    Normal individuals demonstrated superior auditory pattern recognition compared to aphasic subjects across various listening conditions. This highlights potential for nonlinguistic auditory tests in aphasia assessment and training.

    More Related Videos

    Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique
    11:39

    Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique

    Published on: September 7, 2022

    Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
    06:04

    Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

    Published on: March 24, 2023

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jul 26, 2026

    Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
    09:13

    Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

    Published on: April 22, 2015

    Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique
    11:39

    Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique

    Published on: September 7, 2022

    Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
    06:04

    Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

    Published on: March 24, 2023

    Area of Science:

    • Neuroscience
    • Audiology
    • Speech-Language Pathology

    Background:

    • Aphasia, a language disorder, can impair auditory processing.
    • Assessing auditory pattern recognition in aphasia is crucial for understanding deficits.
    • Nonlinguistic stimuli offer a potential avenue for evaluating auditory skills independent of language comprehension.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare auditory pattern recognition abilities between individuals with aphasia and neurologically normal subjects.
    • To investigate performance across different auditory presentation conditions (monaural, split, dichotic).

    Main Methods:

    • Participants included aphasic and normal subject groups.
    • Auditory stimuli consisted of three-element patterns varying in duration.
    • Performance was assessed under monaural right, monaural left, split left leading, split right leading, and dichotic listening conditions.

    Main Results:

    • Normal subjects significantly outperformed aphasic subjects in recognizing auditory patterns across all tested conditions.
    • Minimal overlap was observed between the performance of the two groups, indicating a clear distinction in abilities.
    • This suggests a fundamental deficit in auditory pattern processing associated with aphasia.

    Conclusions:

    • Nonlinguistic auditory pattern recognition tasks can effectively differentiate between aphasic and normal individuals.
    • These findings support the use of nonlinguistic stimuli for assessing auditory processing deficits in aphasia.
    • The results have implications for developing targeted rehabilitation strategies and monitoring progress in aphasia therapy.