Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Stimulus-rule interactions in concept verification

R D Ketchum, L E Bourne

    The American Journal of Psychology
    |March 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Stimulus selection and memory strategies in concept problems.

    Memory & cognition·2013
    Same author

    Picture-word differences and conceptual frequency judgments.

    Memory & cognition·2011
    Same author

    Learning conceptual rules: III. Processes contributing to rule difficulty.

    Memory & cognition·2011
    Same author

    Retention and transfer of morse code reception skill by novices: part-whole training.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2001
    Same author

    Cross-modality priming between odors and odor-congruent words.

    The American journal of psychology·2000
    Same author

    Effects of cortical polarization on mental arithmetic.

    Brain research. Cognitive brain research·1998
    Same journal

    Attributing social meaning to animated shapes: A new experimental study of apparent behavior.

    The American journal of psychology·2021
    Same journal

    Scientific Study of Magic: Binet's Pioneering Approach Based on Observations and Chronophotography.

    The American journal of psychology·2018
    Same journal

    Child and Ancient Man: How to Define Their Commonalities and Differences.

    The American journal of psychology·2018
    Same journal

    Adolescent Aggression as Predicted from Parent-Child Relationships and Executive Functions.

    The American journal of psychology·2018
    Same journal

    The Effect of Collective Transitions on the Organization and Contents of Autobiographical Memory: A Transition Theory Perspective.

    The American journal of psychology·2018
    Same journal

    The Development and Validity of a Chinese Version of the Compound Remote Associates Test.

    The American journal of psychology·2018
    See all related articles
    JoVE
    x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
    ABOUT JoVE
    OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
    AUTHORS
    Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
    LIBRARIANS
    TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
    RESEARCH
    JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
    EDUCATION
    JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
    Terms & Conditions of Use
    Privacy Policy
    Policies

    This study found that stimulus attribute integrality does not affect concept verification speed. Instead, perceptual salience of attributes is the key factor influencing how quickly people verify concepts.

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Perception
    • Rule Learning

    Background:

    • Conceptual rule learning difficulty depends on how stimulus attributes are conjoined.
    • Disjunctive rules are easier for separable attributes, while conjunctive rules are easier for integrable attributes.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate if stimulus attribute integrality influences the speed of verifying stimuli against conjunctive or disjunctive concepts.
    • To determine if the integrality hypothesis explains rule learning results.

    Main Methods:

    • Six experiments were conducted to measure reaction times for stimulus verification.
    • Participants verified stimuli against conjunctive and disjunctive concepts.

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Reaction times in verification tasks did not align with findings from rule-learning experiments.
  • Stimulus attribute integrality did not consistently predict verification speed.
  • Perceptual salience of relevant attributes appeared to be the primary determinant of verification times.

    • Conclusions:

    • The integrality hypothesis is unlikely to explain the results of rule-learning experiments.
    • Perceptual salience, not attribute integrality, is a more probable explanation for verification speed differences.