Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[What scientific publications should be read?]

R Belitzky

    Educacion Medica Y Salud
    |January 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary

    Critically evaluate scientific literature by understanding the scientific method. This approach helps distinguish valid experimental work from less rigorous content, ensuring reliable biomedical research.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Persistence Time of the Ring of Bubbles (PTRB): a method for the quantification of the Foam Tests.

    Journal of perinatal medicine·1981
    Same author

    [A new form of evaluating postnatal growth during the 1st 2 years of life].

    Boletin de la Oficina Sanitaria Panamericana. Pan American Sanitary Bureau·1979
    Same author

    A new method for evaluating postnatal growth in the first two years of life.

    Bulletin of the Pan American Health Organization·1979
    Same author

    Early postnatal growth evaluation in full-term, preterm and small-for-dates infants.

    Early human development·1978
    Same author

    Congenital malformations in diabetic offspring.

    Acta diabetologica latina·1977
    Same author

    Passage of mannitol from mother to amniotic fluid and fetus.

    Obstetrics and gynecology·1977

    Area of Science:

    • Biomedical Sciences
    • Scientific Methodology

    Context:

    • Students often accept authority over evidence.
    • Scientific literature contains varying quality of information.
    • Distinguishing hypotheses from evidence is crucial.

    Purpose:

    • Provide guidelines for analyzing scientific articles.
    • Promote critical evaluation of research.
    • Aid in selecting valuable scientific reading material.

    Summary:

    • Emphasizes learning the scientific method to assess research validity.
    • Highlights the need to identify experimental design components (population, therapies, change).
    • Offers questions to gauge an article's value and usefulness.

    Impact:

    • Enhances critical thinking skills in biomedical students.
    • Improves the ability to discern sound scientific evidence.
    • Contributes to more informed scientific discourse and practice.

    Related Experiment Videos