Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Duty to recall

D Berg, H L Hirsh

    Southern Medical Journal
    |August 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Healthcare law shows a growing divide, with legislatures restricting patient lawsuits while courts expand legal options. A new "duty to recall" emerges, requiring providers to warn patients of past treatment dangers.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Ballet and how it can improve neuromuscular function with age.

    Journal of neurophysiology·2025
    Same author

    Transcranial direct current stimulation of the right temporoparietal junction facilitates hippocampal spatial learning in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment.

    Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2023
    Same author

    Health Service Delivery and Economic Evaluation of Limb Lower Bone-Anchored Prostheses: A Summary of the Queensland Artificial Limb Service's Experience.

    Canadian prosthetics & orthotics journal·2023
    Same author

    [Immune-mediated encephalomyelitis].

    Der Nervenarzt·2021
    Same author

    [Spastic paresis of the arms and flaccid paralysis of the legs in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis].

    Der Nervenarzt·2021
    Same author

    Disease modifying treatment trials in Parkinson's disease: how to balance expectations and interests of patients, physicians and industry partners?

    Neurological research and practice·2020
    Same journal

    SMA's 6th Annual Physicians-in-Training Leadership Conference Abstract Presentations.

    Southern medical journal·2026
    Same journal

    Potential Impact of Lower Federal Loan Availability on Medical Education in Appalachia.

    Southern medical journal·2026
    Same journal

    Experiential Mentorship Skills Training: The Effect on Real-Life Mentoring.

    Southern medical journal·2026
    Same journal

    Social Pressure: How Early Social Context Shapes Career Interest in Medicine.

    Southern medical journal·2026
    Same journal

    Comparing Speed and Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence Large Language Models on the Orthopedic In-Training Examination.

    Southern medical journal·2026
    Same journal

    Don't Wait to Talk about Weight: A 2-Hour Interactive Curriculum Improves Medical Student Skills with Weight Management.

    Southern medical journal·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Law
    • Healthcare Policy
    • Patient Rights

    Background:

    • State legislatures are enacting laws that create barriers for patients pursuing malpractice claims against healthcare providers.
    • Conversely, the judiciary is broadening the scope of legal actions available to patients seeking recourse against physicians and other care providers.
    • Recent legal trends show an expansion of the duty to warn patients, and even third parties, about foreseeable and serious risks associated with medical care and management.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze the evolving legal landscape concerning healthcare providers and patient rights.
    • To highlight the emerging legal concept of a
    • duty to recall
    • patients exposed to treatment-related dangers.
    • To present a case study illustrating this new legal duty and its implications.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Methods:

    • Review of recent legislative trends and judicial decisions in healthcare law.
    • Analysis of the legal precedents related to the duty to warn and the emerging duty to recall.
    • Case study presentation of a specific incident involving a healthcare provider's duty to recall patients.

    Main Results:

    • A significant dichotomy exists between legislative efforts to shield providers and judicial expansion of patient remedies.
    • The legal concept of a
    • duty to recall
    • is identified as a novel and expanding obligation for healthcare providers.
    • The case study demonstrates the practical application and legal ramifications of this duty.

    Conclusions:

    • The legal framework governing healthcare providers is increasingly complex, balancing provider protection with patient rights.
    • The
    • duty to recall
    • represents a significant development in medical malpractice law, extending provider responsibility.
    • This evolving legal duty necessitates careful consideration by healthcare providers to mitigate risks and ensure patient safety.