Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Trends in malpractice litigation

The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine

|July 1, 1980

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Physician mistakes do not automatically equate to medical negligence. Understanding legal standards like "standard of care" and "proximate cause" is crucial for evaluating malpractice claims.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Childhood malignancies and decision making.

The Yale journal of biology and medicine·1992

Same author

Privacy and confidentiality in clinical research.

The Medical staff counselor·1991

Same author

Legal issues in bone marrow transplantation.

The Yale journal of biology and medicine·1990

Same author

The biomedical researcher and subpoenas: judicial protection of confidential medical data.

American journal of law & medicine·1986

Same journal

Chrysoeriol-Mediated Neuroprotection in Parkinson's Disease in Mice: Targeting Apoptosis, α-Synuclein Accumulation, and Functional Recovery.

The Yale journal of biology and medicine·2026

Same journal

Musicality is Preserved in Neurodegeneration.

The Yale journal of biology and medicine·2026

Same journal

Burden of Neurological Disorders in Resource-Limited Settings: Lessons from Pakistan for Global Neurology.

The Yale journal of biology and medicine·2026

Same journal

Comparative Analysis of Prenatal Stress Models: Placental and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Mice.

The Yale journal of biology and medicine·2026

Same journal

Computational Investigation of Flavonoid-Associated Molecular Pathways in Astrogliosis Modulation.

The Yale journal of biology and medicine·2026

Same journal

Regulation and Interaction Among SOCS1 and SOCS3 by MicroRNAs in Multiple Sclerosis: A Review and <i>In Silico</i> Analysis.

The Yale journal of biology and medicine·2026

See all related articles

Area of Science:

Medical Law
Legal Medicine
Healthcare Policy

Background:

Prevailing medical community opinion often conflates physician errors with negligence.
Malpractice litigation is a significant concern within the healthcare sector.

Purpose of the Study:

To clarify the legal distinctions between medical mistakes and negligence.
To analyze factors influencing medical malpractice claims and settlements.
To examine the efficacy of patient consent forms in preventing litigation.

Main Methods:

Discussion of legal concepts: standard of care and proximate cause.
Analysis of jury verdict incidence in litigated malpractice suits.
Examination of insurance company settlement policies and their impact on claims.

Related Experiment Videos

Review of the role of patient consent forms.

Main Results:

Physician errors are not synonymous with legal negligence.
Litigated malpractice suits frequently result in favorable jury verdicts for plaintiffs.
Insurance settlement practices influence the frequency of malpractice claims.
Patient consent forms alone are insufficient to prevent malpractice suits.

Conclusions:

A nuanced understanding of legal standards is essential for evaluating physician conduct.
Reforming insurance settlement policies may reduce unnecessary litigation.
Relying solely on consent forms is an inadequate strategy for malpractice risk management.