Related Experiment Videos
Evaluation of the supine pressor test
Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation
|January 1, 1980
Summary
The roll-over test (ROT) did not reliably predict pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) in healthy pregnant women. Hydrostatic effects and other positional factors may affect blood pressure readings during the test.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Cardiovascular Physiology in Pregnancy
Background:
- Pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) is a significant complication affecting maternal and fetal health.
- Early detection of PIH is crucial for timely intervention and management.
- The roll-over test (ROT) has been proposed as a screening tool for PIH.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the efficacy of the roll-over test (ROT) for the early detection of pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH).
- To assess the relationship between a positive supine pressor test and the subsequent development of PIH.
- To identify factors influencing blood pressure changes during positional testing in pregnancy.
Main Methods:
- Investigated 115 normotensive healthy primigravidae between 28-32 weeks of gestation.
- Performed the roll-over test (ROT) as described by Gant et al.
- Calculated the hydrostatic effect in a subset of 15 women.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant correlation was found between a positive supine pressor test and the development of PIH.
- The hydrostatic effect was identified as a potential confounding factor influencing ROT results.
- Other factors affecting blood pressure with positional changes were also noted.
Conclusions:
- The roll-over test (ROT) may not be a reliable predictor for pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH).
- Hydrostatic effects and other positional influences warrant consideration when interpreting ROT results.
- Further research is needed to refine early detection methods for PIH.