Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Multi-test screening and the chances of being normal

W R Phillips, D J Thompson

    The Journal of Family Practice
    |December 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary

    A common formula overestimates abnormal screening test results in healthy individuals. Clinical judgment, not probability, should guide physicians when interpreting screening tests.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Measurement of the high-energy gamma-ray emission from the Moon with the Fermi Large Area Telescope.

    Physical review. D. (2016)·2020
    Same author

    Observation of inverse Compton emission from a long γ-ray burst.

    Nature·2019
    Same author

    Differential cannibalism and population dynamics in a host-parasitoid system.

    Oecologia·2017
    Same author

    Suppression of Emittance Growth Using a Shaped Cold Atom Electron and Ion Source.

    Physical review letters·2016
    Same author

    THE IMPACT OF CRISIS UPON THE BEHAVIOR OF NATIONS IN THE 1960's.

    Multivariate behavioral research·2016
    Same author

    Classification of neurological abnormalities in children with congenital melanocytic naevus syndrome identifies magnetic resonance imaging as the best predictor of clinical outcome.

    The British journal of dermatology·2015

    Area of Science:

    • Clinical screening
    • Medical diagnostics
    • Biostatistics

    Background:

    • Screening programs require managing abnormal test results.
    • Multiple-test screening batteries often use probability formulas to estimate false positives.
    • The validity of these formulas depends on population-specific assumptions.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the accuracy of a common probability formula used in health screening.
    • To assess the extent to which this formula overestimates abnormal results in healthy populations.
    • To emphasize the role of clinical judgment in interpreting screening test outcomes.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of data from three screening programs.
    • Inclusion of 769 patients undergoing blood chemistry test batteries.
    • Comparison of predicted abnormal results with actual occurrences in healthy individuals.

    Main Results:

    • The commonly used probability formula significantly overestimates the rate of abnormal results in healthy individuals.
    • Empirical data from 769 patients demonstrate the magnitude of this overestimate.
    • The assumptions underlying the probability formula are frequently unmet in clinical practice.

    Conclusions:

    • The application of simple probability formulas in health screening can be misleading.
    • Physicians should rely on clinical judgment rather than misapplied probability theory for interpreting screening results.
    • Accurate interpretation of screening tests is crucial for effective patient management.

    Related Experiment Videos