Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sampling properties of DNA sequence data in phylogenetic analysis

M P Cummings1, S P Otto, J Wakeley

  • 1Department of Integrative Biology, University of California at Berkeley, USA.

Molecular Biology and Evolution
|September 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

Phylogenetic tree inference requires sufficient nucleotide sites for accuracy. Analyzing whole mitochondrial genomes is more reliable than using individual genes or contiguous nucleotide blocks for accurate vertebrate phylogeny.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The best of both worlds: Combining population genetic and quantitative genetic models.

Theoretical population biology·2022
Same author

Liking the good guys: amplifying local adaptation via the evolution of condition-dependent mate choice.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2015
Same author

Why wait? Three mechanisms selecting for environment-dependent developmental delays.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2014
Same author

Loss-of-heterozygosity facilitates passage through Haldane's sieve for Saccharomyces cerevisiae undergoing adaptation.

Nature communications·2014
Same author

Selective maintenance of recombination between the sex chromosomes.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2014
Same author

Comparative analysis reveals that polyploidy does not decelerate diversification in fish.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2014

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Phylogenetic trees are crucial for understanding evolutionary relationships.
  • Mitochondrial genomes are widely used for phylogenetic studies due to their conserved nature and copy number.
  • The reliability of phylogenetic inference depends on the amount and representativeness of the sequence data used.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the accuracy of phylogenetic trees inferred from different genomic data subsets.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of individual genes, random nucleotide samples, and contiguous nucleotide blocks from mitochondrial genomes for reconstructing whole-genome phylogeny.
  • To assess the impact of data sampling strategies on phylogenetic tree accuracy in vertebrates.

Main Methods:

  • Inferred phylogenetic trees using individual genes and random nucleotide samples from mitochondrial genomes of 10 vertebrates.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzed whole mitochondrial genomes to establish a reference phylogenetic tree.
  • Compared trees derived from subsets of genomic data against the whole-genome tree.
  • Evaluated the performance of contiguous nucleotide blocks versus individually sampled sites.
  • Main Results:

    • Individual genes are often insufficient for accurately reconstructing the whole-genome phylogenetic tree.
    • A large number of nucleotide sites is necessary for precise whole-genome tree determination.
    • Relatively small, randomly sampled datasets can yield trees close to the whole-genome tree.
    • Blocks of contiguous sites are less effective than individually sampled sites and may violate bootstrap method assumptions.

    Conclusions:

    • Phylogenetic accuracy is significantly influenced by the quantity and sampling strategy of nucleotide sites.
    • Random sampling of nucleotides across the genome provides a more representative dataset than contiguous blocks.
    • Careful consideration of data sampling is essential for robust phylogenetic inference, particularly when using subsets of genomic data.