Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Study design for exposure assessment in epidemiological studies

B Armstrong1

  • 1School of Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, PQ, Canada.

The Science of the Total Environment
|June 16, 1995
PubMed
Summary

Optimizing epidemiological studies requires careful resource allocation for exposure assessment accuracy. Investing in improved exposure measurement is beneficial until the cost outweighs the gain in study efficiency, measured by the validity coefficient squared.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Australian guidelines for anal cancer screening using anal human papillomavirus testing with cytology triage in people living with HIV.

HIV medicine·2025
Same author

The utility of behavioral biometrics in user authentication and demographic characteristic detection: a scoping review.

Systematic reviews·2024
Same author

Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of structured programming and a parent intervention to mitigate accelerated summer BMI gain: a pilot study.

Pilot and feasibility studies·2023
Same author

Correction to: Early-stage studies to larger-scale trials: investigators' perspectives on scaling-up childhood obesity interventions.

Pilot and feasibility studies·2022
Same author

Early-stage studies to larger-scale trials: investigators' perspectives on scaling-up childhood obesity interventions.

Pilot and feasibility studies·2022
Same author

Wireless phone use in childhood and adolescence and neuroepithelial brain tumours: Results from the international MOBI-Kids study.

Environment international·2022

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Health Research Methods

Background:

  • Exposure assessment accuracy is crucial for epidemiological study efficiency.
  • Resource allocation for improving exposure assessment precision requires careful consideration.
  • Measurement error in exposure or confounders can bias results and reduce study power.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the optimal allocation of resources for improving exposure assessment accuracy in epidemiological studies.
  • To provide a framework for balancing study efficiency and the cost of enhanced exposure assessment.
  • To evaluate the impact of measurement error on study validity and efficiency.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing a general result relating study efficiency to the square of the correlation between true and approximate exposures (validity coefficient).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Applying this principle to guide investment in exposure measurement precision.
  • Considering conditions under which this result may not hold, such as differential measurement error or confounder misclassification.

    • Main Results:

    • Study efficiency, relative to exact exposures, is the square of the validity coefficient.
    • Investment in increased exposure precision is justified when the proportional cost increase per subject is less than the proportional gain in the squared validity coefficient.
    • Differential measurement error or confounder misclassification violates the assumptions and affects the validity of this efficiency calculation.

    Conclusions:

    • Resource allocation for exposure assessment should be guided by the validity coefficient to maximize study power.
    • While validity sub-studies can correct bias, they do not substantially recover lost efficiency.
    • Careful consideration of measurement error types and their impact is essential for robust epidemiological research.