Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Measurement error in air pollution exposure assessment

W Navidi1, F Lurmann

  • 1Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles 90033, USA.

Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology
|April 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

Assessing individual air pollutant exposure using personal samplers or microenvironmental methods involves measurement error. Correcting for this error can improve health effect estimates, with personal exposure data generally yielding more accurate results than ambient air levels.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Early-Life Air Pollution Exposure Is Associated with the Infant Gut Microbiome and Fecal Metabolome in the First Two Years of Life.

Research report (Health Effects Institute)·2026
Same author

Long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution and stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

International journal of hygiene and environmental health·2022
Same author

Ambient air pollutants are associated with morning serum cortisol in overweight and obese Latino youth in Los Angeles.

Environmental health : a global access science source·2021
Same author

Prenatal traffic-related air pollution exposures, cord blood adipokines and infant weight.

Pediatric obesity·2017
Same author

Air pollution, weight loss and metabolic benefits of bariatric surgery: a potential model for study of metabolic effects of environmental exposures.

Pediatric obesity·2017
Same author

Living near a freeway is associated with lower bone mineral density among Mexican Americans.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2015

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Health
  • Epidemiology
  • Exposure Science

Background:

  • Accurate assessment of individual air pollutant exposure is crucial for understanding health effects.
  • Exposure assessment can be indirect (microenvironmental) or direct (personal sampling).
  • Both methods are prone to measurement error, potentially biasing health effect estimates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of measurement error in air pollutant exposure assessment on health effect estimates.
  • To compare the accuracy of health effect estimates derived from personal exposure versus ambient air levels.

Main Methods:

  • The study discusses statistical approaches to correct for measurement error in exposure data.
  • It considers bias in linear models when measurement error is known and nondifferential.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Compares health effect estimates based on individual exposures versus ambient air concentrations.
  • Main Results:

    • Measurement error in exposure assessment can introduce significant bias into health effect estimates.
    • Bias can be corrected in linear models if exposure estimates are unbiased and error is nondifferential, provided error variance is known.
    • Estimates of health effects are generally more accurate when based on individual exposures compared to ambient levels, unless measurement error is substantial.

    Conclusions:

    • Accurate exposure assessment is vital for reliable health effect studies.
    • Understanding and correcting for measurement error is essential to minimize bias.
    • Personal exposure monitoring offers a more accurate approach for estimating health effects of air pollution compared to ambient monitoring.