Related Experiment Videos
Vascular laboratory personnel on-call: effect on patient management
J M Lohr1, K V James, K A Hasselfeld
1John J. Cranley Vascular Laboratory, Good Samaritan Hospital, Cincinnati, OH 45220-2489, USA.
Purpose:
A prospective study was undertaken of all vascular laboratory tests performed by the "on-call" technologist during a 3-year time period.
Methods:
Technologists take call on a rotating basis. All patients evaluated had symptoms. History and risk factor data were collected at the time of patient encounter.
Results:
Studies were initiated from the emergency department 56% of the time, from inpatient examinations 33% of the time, and from outpatient examinations 11% of the time. Ninety percent (n = 440) of the studies obtained were venous duplex scans (VDS). Fifty-eight percent (257 of 440) of the studies were performed on weekends. Thirty-two percent of the studies resulted in admission of the patient. Of the 440 VDS obtained, 51% (224 of 440) identified some type of disease. Acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT) was diagnosed in 15% (67 of 440), acute superficial venous thrombosis (SVT) in 4% (17 of 440), acute DVT and SVT in 7% (31 of 440), chronic DVT in 4% (17 of 440), chronic SVT in 4% (16 of 440), and chronic DVT and SVT in 1% (3 of 440); 2% (9 of 440) of the DVTs were of indeterminate age. Other diseases were identified in 22% (95 of 440), including popliteal cysts, inguinal lymphadenopathy, and soft tissue edema.
Conclusions:
Having an "on-call" vascular technologist has allowed patients with acute venous thrombosis to be triaged and admitted, if necessary, in a timely fashion. Those patients who have symptoms and a negative VDS result are able to avoid unnecessary hospitalization and treatment. The expense of this service is easily justified by the savings of unnecessary hospital days.